Posted on 09/24/2026 1:10:10 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
1. Hopium
Last week Tim talked with Jesse Lehrich, who walked through a scenario where the D’s wind up with 54 Senate seats a few weeks from now.
54.
That’s crazy. But not as crazy as it sounds. There is a path. All Dems have to do is run the table on the Big 5 races,1 win a gettable Iowa, and then luck into Kansas. Hell, if you want an even bigger hit of the dragon, you can get to 56 seats if there’s a backlash to Darline Graham in South Carolina and Dan Osborn overperforms in Nebraska.
What would Democrats do with 56 senators?
This would be a caucus with instantly vulnerable freshmen in Alaska and Texas. The South Carolina senator would be an assumed one-termer. There would be an independent from a red state. And John Fetterman.
Suddenly that 56-seat best-case scenario looks awfully soft.
SNIP
(Excerpt) Read more at thebulwark.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
All those years he successfully posed as “conservative.” He’s the political version of Buffy Sainte-Marie.
I guess the upside here is that John Thune will no longer be Senate Majority Leader.
What did Republicans do (or not do) to make such a mess of things?
Kristol wants us out of the Middle East? That’s what he lived for!
Kristol?
Has he ever been right about anything?
Jonathan Last is still titled in most publications as a “conservative columnist.”
Crack is bad. Give it up.
Bull. Screw Canada. They are a boil on our butt at best. We don’t need their stuff.
Ridiculous
Nope. Veto.
Takes 2/3rd of both houses to override.
True.
It’s like impeachment talk.
Let the Dems in the House try. This time Trump will probably not even reply.
Subpoena them? Good luck. Just ignore them. What are they going to do? Refer people to the DOJ? I’m sure AG Blanche will just sit on them. Merrick Garland did.
Its not like Iran has been at war with the United States for 47 years!
It is not as if Iran has not plotted for and called for the destruction of the United States for 47 years.
It is not as if Iran in their ideology consistently calls the United States the “Great Satan” and Israel the “little Satan”.
It is not as if they had enough enriched uranium for a few nuclear bombs.
If a country declares they wish to destroy you, year, after year after decade after decade... Believe them.
Why?
The US has *easily* benefitted more from trade with Canada than they have from us. Just overlay the GDP, per capita income, or any other national metric.
And we *liked each other*. Two nations - sharing the longest undefended border on the planet - that get along, share a lot of common culture, and had a longstanding mutually beneficial trade relationship.
Even if you’re a collectivist-oriented protectionist striving for some Ceaușescu or Kim family or Albanian Hoxha crap — even those nutters didn’t pick a fight with an advantageous trading partner.
“...fighting a war for Israel was more important.”
Because an Iran with nukes would pose no threat to the USA...
Bronco Obama and Big Mike Obama might fly out Jonathan V. Last and Bill Kristol’s butts...
Bet you felt bad about not going over the border with the rest of the guys on October 7th, ditzy...
True. It wasn’t discussed until Trump decided to make it a thing on the campaign Trail by promising to release every page of the Epstein file. after that, it was off to the races.
Their GDP is less than most states. We don’t need their oil, lumber or syrup. Alaska has more oil.
Vermont and others makes syrup.
We have more trees.
What else do we get?
They are practically socialist. They use our Healthcare system. They euthanize their people.
They rely on our military.
Remember when the Bullsh.(um)..warkers pretended to be principled Republicans who just didn’t like Trump???
Spoken like a Soviet economic minister 50 years ago.
“We have all we need and must protect the fruits of the workers from the bourgeoisie capitalists!”
I understand many people who claim to be conservatives have decided to join the socialists and agree to government-controlled trade, but I still disagree.
Countries do not trade; people and freely associated/vested companies do. Unless you’re a communist state where the government determines what you ‘trade’. Ask the USSR how that turned out.
So what do “we” get? A country where you get to exist at the very top of the free market totem pole and succeed or fail on your own merits.
Spoken like a Soviet economic minister 50 years ago.
“We have all we need and must protect the fruits of the workers from the bourgeoisie capitalists!”
I understand many people who claim to be conservatives have decided to join the socialists and agree to government-controlled trade, but I still disagree.
Countries do not trade; people and freely associated/vested companies do. Unless you’re a communist state where the government determines what you ‘trade’. Ask the USSR how that turned out.
So what do “we” get? A country where you get to exist at the very top of the free market totem pole and succeed or fail on your own merits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.