Yeah, I know this is a new DNA analysis separated from previous ones some years ago.
As I had said earlier about this, everybody on both sides of the aisle is celebrating there has not been this much unity since 9/11.
Jefferson haters everywhere are hugging, rejoicing, and smiling with glee.
It’s a damning visual on just how deeply left wing history has become - in part because conservatives abandoned history and said to progressives “here, you can have this. We want you to have it!”.(but that is another story)
IF you took 100 historians you could not come up with 100 minutes for which you could collectively add together from them for which they have researched God in connection with the Founding. (Eric Metaxas found it all over the place, since he simply read original sources)
But just one historian on this Jefferson story, you can single handedly count up years and decades of time for which they have researched connections.
If no historians write the story of America’s Godly Heritage, well there are no books and that proves it did not exist. America is secular.
(Just making a cross connection here)
The historians are worse than The New York Times. I hate their guts. There’s like five good historians out there and one of them is an actual FReeper with PragerU who will talk with us. Meanwhile there’s like several million bogus leftist historians.
The conservative retreat from culture nearly a century ago has cost us profoundly.
Yeah, I know this is a new DNA analysis separated from previous ones some years ago.
It is very new, but old enough to have been accepted in court to determine admissible evidence in a murder trial. It is about what new science reveals using hair without follicles. The Richard Green cited inn the Gilgo Beach murder case is also the first named author of the paper submitted to bioRxiv.
https://www.liherald.com/stories/gilgo-dna-evidence-allowed,217179
Hair DNA evidence deemed admissible in Gilgo Beach murder trial
Posted September 3, 2025
In September 2025, Suffolk County Supreme Court Judge Tim Mazzei ruled that Astrea Forensics’ whole genome sequencing method — which extracts SNP data from rootless hairs and creates DNA profiles — is “generally accepted as reliable within the scientific community”. This was the first time such technology was admitted in a New York state court, setting a potential precedent. The judge’s decision relied on expert testimony from University of Washington professor Kelley Harris and Astrea Labs founder Richard Green, and no defense expert contested the method’s reliability.