[Gunslingr3]

I have provided an accurate description of the current law on privacy in public places which you continue to ignore.

Exactly.

You miss the point entirely.

It’s about TRACKING people and government agent access to that data without a warrant.

Not whether or not your picture can be snapped in public.

How can I get this to sink in for you when I can’t get you to even acknowledge what the Court has said?

You keep deliberately cutting it out of your replies and refusing to address it.

This is why I find you disingenuous and a fraud.

Good day, sir.

[DugwayDuke]

Gunslingr3 wrote: “You miss the point entirely. It’s about TRACKING people and government agent access to that data without a warrant. Not whether or not your picture can be snapped in public. How can I get this to sink in for you when I can’t get you to even acknowledge what the Court has said?”

Simply because you refuse to acknowledge that current law holds that you have no expectation of privacy in the public view. You continue to misrepresent what the courts have said. You continue to insist that because the courts have ruled that using Cell Phone Location Data requires a warrant, that using Flock cameras requires a warrant.

As I said, if you don’t believe me, go consult with an attorney and you’ll find that what I’ve said is correct.