Replies

There are a zillion cameras now so why only 1 blurry short video of “Bigfoot”?

That's simply not true. See above pic of a Bigfoot in the apple orchard. The land owner thought some kids were poaching his apples, and that's the image he captured. It's not a human kid. Perhaps a better question is why should people produce images or video they may have if skeptics will always claim that the photographic evidence is faked, either a man in an ape suit or an AI generated image. The photographic evidence is not all there is. There are the "big foot" footprints found out in the woods far from human habitation, which are not quite human, and the left and right feet walk inline rather than in parallel like humans walk. Someone flew out to a lake in a remote part of Canada, and found such foot prints around the lake. There are also vocalizations recorded, etc. Then there are the interactions, including abductions, sometimes temporary, and other times perhaps not. Many people just disappear in federal parks and forests never to be found again. Yet, it's illegal to fly drones in those same federal forests. Why is that? What would proof that Bigfoot exists do to the logging industry if the Sasquatch were proved to exist and be an endangered species? Would Bigfoot get more or less federal protection than the Spotted Owl? Many people don't want to believe that relic hominids exist. They will demand to be shown a corpse of one, and if one were produced they would claim it was the last one living. The critics will never be convinced that we are not the only living hominid native to North America, or elsewhere in the world.