“”I didn’t even mention the world valid. Or the word truthful.
But like it or not, they need to be considered a source in the media, if for nothing else because President talks to the Times and its reporters.
Whatever re: DU.””
***
You didn’t mention it... (valid or truthful)... I did in my response to Alberta’s Child’s comment...
““”Anyone who thinks Netanyahu is “controlling Trump” certainly has a legitimate basis for this.”””
You chimed in and seemingly defended AC’s use of NYT as if you ALSO consider AC’s comment sourcing the NYSlimes as the truth. So which is it? Do you think Netanyahu is controlling Trump or not?
I think it’s typical anti-Trump and anti-Israel/anti-Bibi BS and I, for one, am FTFU with seeing that crap posted here on an almost daily basis... and on a MAGA, pro-Trump, pro-Israel, Christian Conservative forum. That kind of commentary has NOTHING to do with the issue of whether or not we should post from the lying leftist propaganda sources. It’s when certain posters here agree with that BS that it becomes “the issue”.
Yes, we should post leftist sources here but NOT use them as truthful or valid sources to back up anti-Trump crap. It’s not complex.
Seemingly is what you want to believe.
I don't consider it the truth. It's one article from the NYT. But the fact that President Trump has talked with Times reporters - at length in some cases - means their stories can be taken into consideration. That doesn't mean that people should believe them - "do you own research" as they say.
And no idea on President Trump being controlled.