Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: thefactor

“A camera violates basic human dignity? “

Government tracking does, and that is what FLOCK is about.


72 posted on 07/31/2026 3:57:29 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad
This is where people make mistakes. Flock is a private company. They sell cameras and subscriptions. That's how they make money. Most flock cameras are owned by private companies, HOAs, universities, and local governments.

Flock cameras collect data passively. They do not use facial recognition. Data is stored for 30 days.

Flock data is used to deter crime and also to help solve past crimes. Under current constitutional interpretations, individuals have no reasonable expectation of privacy for their vehicle's movements on public streets, so flock cameras are perfectly legal on public roads.

To be blunt, the government doesn't give a shit what you're doing. You don't matter that much. Neither do I. But if there's an amber alert or my car gets stolen or someone robs a bank, do I want the local police department to have flock data available to them? Of course I do. Your opinion may differ.

74 posted on 07/31/2026 5:56:26 AM PDT by thefactor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson