Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fireman15

fireman15 wrote: “Of course costs are spread across both consumers and commercial users. That is literally the entire problem. You just admitted the exact point we have been making all along. Here is why spreading those costs out is so unfair to local homeowners and retirees:”

Why is this any different than spreading any of the costs of new roads, sewage, etc., of new subdivisions? Reminds me of the claims made by local residents against a road providing additional access across local mountain range, “I don’t want my taxes to go for a road to a golf course.” Of course that completely ignored all the new residential and commercial construction in that area. Deny as much as you like but it’s logically the same argument.


59 posted on 07/30/2026 5:07:16 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pickhe expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: DugwayDuke
Comparing a public road or a local neighborhood to a massive, speculative server farm is a completely false equivalence, especially when you look at how this entire boom is being artificially inflated.

Here is why that comparison completely falls apart in the real world:

1. Housing Developers Pay Their Own Impact Fees
When a developer builds a housing subdivision or a road, local laws force them to pay heavy upfront impact fees to cover water, sewer, and road capacity. A homebuilder does not get to stick local seniors and homeowners with the bill for neighborhood streets. With data centers, utilities fold multi-billion-dollar power lines and substation upgrades directly into baseline electric rates, forcing regular folks to fund the buildout.

2. Artificial Demand Driven by Circular Financing
A huge portion of this frantic data center expansion is not driven by genuine, profitable consumer demand, but by a corporate shell game. Giant tech corporations invest billions into AI startups, and those startups are required to spend that exact same money buying cloud processing and chips right back from the tech giant. Both companies turn around and report "record revenue growth" to Wall Street, artificially pumping up their valuations and using those fake numbers to justify building even more unneeded data centers.

3. Roads Last Generations; AI Hardware Goes Obsolete in Years
A public road or sewer system is lasting infrastructure that serves an entire community for 50 or 100 years. By contrast, these speculative server farms run on hardware that becomes functionally obsolete in just a few years. When the circular financing bubble pops and the hype cools off, local utility customers will still be stuck paying off 30-year power company bonds for grid upgrades built for an artificial boom.

4. Privatized Profits, Socialized Stranded Assets
When a real road is built, families move in, pay local property taxes, and support local businesses. In this data center gold rush, multi-trillion-dollar corporations pocket massive short-term stock gains while shifting all the long-term financial risk onto regular citizens. Local retirees on fixed incomes end up paying higher monthly electric bills to underwrite infrastructure for a speculative financial scheme.

A public road built for an entire town is lasting, useful infrastructure. Forcing local seniors and working families to subsidize an artificially inflated corporate buildout is not "logically the same." It is corporate welfare funded by everyday ratepayers.

60 posted on 07/30/2026 7:08:49 AM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson