JD Vance Just EVISCERATED The Hosts of The View over their false claims about Donald Trump and Epstein LIVE On-Air: "One of the things you see in the Epstein emails is the Jeffrey Epstein hated Donald Trump. [2 min video]

X.com ^ | June 6, 2026 | Benny Johnson @bennyjohnson

[ransomnote]

Benny Johnson

@bennyjohnson

 

JD Vance Just EVISCERATED The Hosts of The View over their false claims about Donald Trump and Epstein LIVE On-Air:

"One of the things you see in the Epstein emails is the Jeffrey Epstein hated Donald Trump. Donald Trump literally reported Epstein to the police."

"He threw Epstein out of his club when he found out he was a creep and reported him to the police. That's something the media often misses when it reports the story. They say they knew each other in the 80s... they ignore the fact he narc'ed on him to the police, which ultimately let to Epstein's downfall."

 

[ransomnote]

The View members can't bare to hear anything other than the MSM talking points.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

Trump protected his friends, not himself. And even non-friends and mere acquaintances who probably wouldn’t do the for him if the roles were switched.

Still not a good look.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

Sorry typos:

Trump protected his friends that were in the Epstein files* not himself. And even non-friends and mere acquaintances who probably wouldn’t do the same* for him if the roles were switched.

Still not a good look.

[Dr. Sivana]

they ignore the fact he narc'ed on him to the police

I thought I was the only one who used that expression still. And I do it half-ironically (1975 vibes). Good for him for employing it!

[rktman]

Home run!

[Beowulf9]

Joy, Whoopi, Sunny…all ‘happy names’ not a smile among them.

[Steely Tom]

Liberals think in slogans.

[vivenne]

Which friends who were in the files did Trump protect?

[LeonardFMason]

What are you saying? What is not a good look?

[Texas Eagle]

Anna Navarro had the gall to portray Trump and Epstein as close friends while Whoopi had begged Epstein to borrow his jet. That’s not the type of thing you aks from a stranger.

[tired&retired]

JD Vance visits the barn and avoids the manure.

[Dan in Wichita]

Still not a good look.

Who was Trump trying to protect? You don't know anything.

[Vaduz]

Alethophobia. It is a psychological aversion or excessive anxiety towards the truth, reality, or knowledge that might contradict a person’s deeply held beliefs or preconceived worldview.

Sounds like the View.

[Oystir]

no, he changed the subject matter. Epstein hasn’t been about Trump for years. The White House/Blondi and their reaction, lack of candor, deep state... have been and remain the issue of the day: https://nypost.com/2026/06/16/opinion/michael-goodwin-leaked-and-classified-situation-room-talks-demands-a-criminal-probe-from-furious-trump/

[Thank You Rush]

“”Pick a little, talk a little, pick a little, talk a little,
cheep cheep cheep, talk a lot, pick a little more””

Compliments of “The Music Man”......

[Opinionated Blowhard]

Can we please stop using the following words or phrases in headlines - eviscerated, destroyed, wrecked, “devastated with one word”, shattered. As much as I like the idea that our conservative heroes are out there causing liberals to flee in panic or recoil from the logic of conservative arguments like Dracula from a Cross or a demon from holy water, the headlines are just clickbait and are getting old.

The dictionary definition of “eviscerated” is disemboweled. While Ana Navaro and the rest of the View harpies lack brains, they still have functioning bodies and will be back tomorrow spewing the same crap. So I’d appreciate conservative publications skipping the hyperbole in the future.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

Which friends who were in the files did Trump protect?

Hi vivenne, the world Trump has floated in his entire adult life and career is transactional, astronomically wealthy, and used to being above the law - both legal and spiritual. For starters, Trump made very clear he was not interested in seeing the Clintons go through the ringer over Epstein. Despite chanting "lock her up" in years prior, and no longer being on friendly terms with them.

Trump also told (ex-Fox host) Bill O'Reilly that he did not want people's names tarnished merely for appearing.

Yet, when asked about the actual implicated Prince Andrew's arrest while on Air Force One, the President had a sympathetic response. "I think it's sad...I feel so bad for the royal family." (Instead of calling for accountability.)

Treasury Secretary Howard Lutnick was probably the most prominently featured in files with regard to flight logs to the island - but you know else? Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Alan Dershowitz, Tom Barrack, Alex Acosta, Brett Ratner, Steve Bannon, and countless others had regular exchanges with Epstein. Are they CRIMINALS? Even if not, the "you are the company you keep" proverb rings strong in people's minds especially when it comes to the elites.

Our founding fathers knew that a debauched and entrenched aristocracy ate away at the fabric of the empires and countries in Europe they had escaped.

It’s not a good look that President Trump remains so closely linked and protective of the very swamp he promised to drain. The Epstein files confirmed the incestuous ties between the elites in every industry: from D.C. to Wall Street to Hollywood - to foreign governments and monarchies. The 2 tier reality and justice system is global.

Worst of all, Trump spent precious political capital in the most crucial first days of his second term scolding the very base that him into office - for caring at all. He promised transparency on the campaign trail. And his refusal to deliver snuffed a lot of the momentum out of MAGA.

[Dan in Wichita]

Like I said, you don’t know anything. You’re just a rabble rouser trying in vain to somehow connect Trump to the Epstein crimes.

[CondoleezzaProtege]

Ignoring the warnings of our founders, you want to treat Trump like a king and put him above criticism.

Trump is the one that jeopardized MAGA with his response and he’s playing catch up today with things like by not putting a DNI nominee forward so he can finally put voting restrictions on top of the agenda before the midterms. (The midterms are also more than a mess than they need to be because of Trump’s early mishaps.)

[vivenne]

While arguments could be made for a few of points if documentation proved accurate, comments about Prince Andrew’s culpability and Trump’s response don’t really add up because the US has no control over UK criminal prosecutions. Nor does Trump have all facts about anything related to the Prince or whatever he is called now, nor did he want to criticize the Royal Family whom he has to deal with over murky info and in turn made a diplomat response when asked about it.