Replies

Let me sum this up for those who want to know.

1) We have a cosmological explanation that we NEED to apply to fit the Big Bang model.

2) The big bang model needs a certain amount of mass (and subsequently energy) to exist in the universe for it to have even a chance of occurring.

3) The actual observations are showing we are missing large numbers of orders of magnitudes to mass and energy for the big bang to have happened.

4) Since there is no better explanation than the Big Bang - science has clung to what they know is not probable

5) To defend their beliefs (without evidence), they created Dark Matter and Dark Energy - the idea is that it’s and Invisible Mass and Energy at immense scale - far more matter and energy that we see in all the galaxies.

6) They have searched to try to prove it exists, but can’t.

What’s funny is they have painted themselves into a logical corner! How so? They have to have prove that something exists that they claim they cannot observe. Now you may say that they can see the impact of that on an observable thing....Which is like saying I can prove God’s existence by His impact on people’s lives. They find this very distasteful...

Warning: This contains crude language, but makes a hilarious point!

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qJguU6sLR-8?feature=share

There are some issues with your post:

1) We have a cosmological explanation that we NEED to apply to fit the Big Bang model.

The core Big Bang theory (hot, dense early universe expanding) is supported independently by multiple lines of evidence. Additional elements were added because data demanded them, not because scientists "needed" to prop up the model.

2) The big bang model needs a certain amount of mass (and subsequently energy) to exist in the universe for it to have even a chance of occurring.

The Big Bang describes the evolution of the universe from a hot, dense state onward. It doesn't require a specific total mass/energy "of occurring."

3) The actual observations are showing we are missing large numbers of orders of magnitudes to mass and energy for the big bang to have happened.

The "missing" mass/energy is inferred because gravity (via General Relativity) doesn't match observations unless extra unseen components are included. It's not that the Big Bang "couldn't have happened" without them.

5) "To defend their beliefs (without evidence), they created Dark Matter and Dark Energy - the idea is that it’s an Invisible Mass and Energy at immense scale - far more matter and energy that we see in all the galaxies."

Dark matter and dark energy were not invented ad hoc to "save" the Big Bang. They were inferred from observations that couldn't be explained by visible matter alone.