The important story is that
1- On Election Day, Bass and Pratt and Raman received approximately the vote percentages that all of the polls predicted.
2- After Election Day, there were only mail-in votes to count.
3- On Day 1 of the mail-in counts, Raman did so poorly that she CONCEDED. She got about 9k out of the 117k that were counted. That's single digits.
4- OUT OF THE SAME MAIL-IN VOTES, on Day Two of the Mail-in Counting, Raman somehow, magically, got 82k of the 160k ballots that were counted... well over 50%.
There are only 2 possible explanations for how this could happen... either ballots were opened and sorted but not counted... which would be extremely curious, and would require explanation... or else the counting is absolutely fraudulent.
It is literally mathematically and statistically impossible to have a data set (the mail-in ballots, which are either Pratt or Bass or Raman) with over 300,000 data points, where the first 120,000 pulled are 8% Raman and the second 160,000 are 51% Raman. Even if you want to pretend that there is a disparity in the preferences for mail-in voters and in-person voters, that is irrelevant. The only votes to look at for this OVERWHELMING PROOF of fraud, is the mail-in ballots. They literally and scientifically cannot have a sample of 8% one day and 51% the next day, unless the sample size is well below 200... it was over 300,000.
The classic example is pulling colored beans out of a bag... let's use red and white and blue for the 250th... If you have 300,000 red and white and blue beans in a bag, and you pull 8% blue in your first 120,000, you simply cannot pull 51% blue in the next 160,000 unless the pulling isn't blind... in other words, rigged.
We have been watching - hearing - ONLY the LA mayor’s race results. Ramanh has been now routinely been getting tens of thousands of “newly counted votes” each release. Pratt has been receiving very, very few.
What about the ten thousand races? Each too needs to be counted, be totaled up, have THEIR two-way and three-way and six-way closecraces “decided”.
HavecTHOSECTOTALS in the OTHER RACES been changing proportionally to the “now landsliding “ socialist votes that would be expected if a socialist is selected to be nbr two in the mayor’s race?