To: Bon of Babble
It’s the old tired argument of “who will pay for social security and take care of the old people?”Which is why the Feds need to dismantle Social Security.
It should be up to the states to take care of the elderly. And it should be needs only Social Security, if you have assets, you're not going to get it.
To: MinorityRepublican
It should be up to the states to take care of the elderly. And it should be needs only Social Security, if you have assets, you're not going to get it. I are you smoking some weed this morning?
68 posted on
06/08/2026 8:01:15 AM PDT by
EVO X
( )
To: MinorityRepublican
It should be up to the states to take care of the elderly. And it should be needs only Social Security, if you have assets, you're not going to get it. I are you smoking some weed this morning?
69 posted on
06/08/2026 8:01:18 AM PDT by
EVO X
( )
To: MinorityRepublican
“It should be up to the states to take care of the elderly.”
I don’t think Florida could fund its old folks.
76 posted on
06/08/2026 10:33:08 AM PDT by
Brian Griffin
(Ask your Congressman to tax tariff refunds at 100% & > $300 to many insured vehicle owners 4 gas)
To: MinorityRepublican
“And it should be needs only Social Security, if you have assets, you’re not going to get it.”
An offset to the interest deduction might be made.
If you permit people to game a system, they will.
77 posted on
06/08/2026 10:36:34 AM PDT by
Brian Griffin
(Ask your Congressman to tax tariff refunds at 100% & > $300 to many insured vehicle owners 4 gas)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson