Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CondoleezzaProtege
Hardly a compelling study.

An activist environmental group hand picks counties where it thinks cancer rates should be higher than average and reports that 60% of those counties have higher rates (leaving unsaid that 40% have lower rates). There appears to be no mention of how the study related any of the cancer patients to agricultural employment or how it ruled out other carcinogens.

4 posted on 06/04/2026 1:57:58 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Lucky

gaslight away! the Iowans aren’t buying it.


6 posted on 06/04/2026 2:22:27 PM PDT by CondoleezzaProtege (🩰🎶)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky

There are a lot of old people there, but high rates of Hodgkin’s lymphoma shouldn’t be related to farming unless there’s a cause.

However, this study just counts all cancers, which is expected for an older population. 1/3 cancer, 1/3 strokes, 1/3 heart disease.


11 posted on 06/04/2026 7:04:51 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson