Posted on 06/04/2026 1:57:30 AM PDT by RandFan
@shadowJ47
This is attempted murder caught on multiple angles by UK cops gone full rogue.
A lone patriot stands there with arms folded when the riot squad swarms him, slamming shield edges into his head and neck over and over like they’re trying to crack his skull open.
Blood flying, repeated rabbit punches with riot gear — the kind of blows banned in boxing because they kill.
This isn’t “restraint.” It’s a pack hunting a native Brit in his own country while real criminals get kid gloves.
Two-tier policing at its bloodiest: protect the imports, smash the locals who dare speak up.
Britain’s native sons are now fair game for state thugs enforcing the replacement agenda.
No trust left in these goons.
The people see it clear as day.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Going rogue implies this is unsanctioned by the British government. It’s not. It’s policy.
Great Britain is no longer a western democracy. It’s an Orwellian caliphate.
There isn’t a drop of testosterone in all of England.
He grabbed the officer and held on.
He wrestled with the officer on the ground.
This was not passive non-violence.
He was violently resisting arrest.
I sympathize with the British people. But the description of a man as someone the police are beating for no reason is not correct.
I’m often opposed to RandFan’s point of view, but y’all are missing the point.
The Western world (USA included) has been inconsistent on how it deploys it’s own government terrorists. Different groups get different “justice”. The UK is no longer able to hide it, either.
We’re too good for that in America?
Compare how your taxpayer funded terror groups treated the BLM and Antifa types to the treatment the Branch Davidiens, the Weavers, and the Bundys got. - And the latter weren’t out destroying public property and doing violence. They were in their own homes.
Evil committed on behalf of the state is still evil.
There should be a special, even more severe punishment for doing this and calling it “law enforcement”. Judges, prosecutors, and even the trigger pullers should face real justice and be put on display for everyone to see. Until we do that, the problem will never get better. Only worse.
The British People have allowed it.
You get the government you deserve--and demand--and vice versa.
“Evil committed on behalf of the state is still evil.”
Cops are just paid mercenaries - they’ll do the bidding of those paying them.
So if they routinely do “bad” things is because those paying them told them to.
Sounds a lot like the criminal justice system here in America - violent black street thugs get a slap on the wrist and walk free with probation after committing homicide, armed robbery, or felonious assault, while normal, middle class Americans can rot in prison for minor inconsistencies in their tax returns.
It is difficult to see how you can be so stupid. Did you watch the video?
“He grabbed the officer and held on.”
The officer came over and pulled him out into the street. While he was being pulled out into the street, he was attacked from behind by other officers, BEFORE he could do anything.
“He wrestled with the officer on the ground.”
He was not wrestling, he was trying to preserve his life.
“This was not passive non-violence.”
Passive non-violence is not in this scene. He was set upon and beat before he could offer any resistance.
“He was violently resisting arrest.”
Where was the violence he was supposed to have delivered? He was set upon by a crowd of officers and beat before he had a chance to shield himself, which is what he was doing.
These officers are in trouble.
Whataboutism??? Imagine the riots that would occur if he had been nonwhite.
“He is trying to stay on his feet to avoid that beating he was given.”
Looks like he was wrestling with a cop which RESULTED in the beating he got.
OR DID THEY DO THAT TO EVERYONE THERE?
Once an ICE protestor starts fighting ICE, I expect ICE to do whatever it takes to arrest him.
Why should I expect British cops to be different?
“Once an ICE protestor starts fighting ICE, I expect ICE to do whatever it takes to arrest him.
Why should I expect British cops to be different?”
To go back to the video, he was attacked from behind while being led out into the street. And why was he pulled out into the street, while standing on the side of the street?
Why can’t some of you people watch the vidoe before making comments?
The video shows him grabbing the police officer’s arm before moving into the street.
You can see it at the very start of the video.
he should have worn a table cloth on his head
“And why was he pulled out into the street, while standing on the side of the street?”
Why didn’t the person FILMING provide us the answer? Hmmmm? Why no context, unless the context would spoil the narrative?
How does this differ from the left using short, out of context clips to claim ICE (or NICE) are Nazis? Why do you swallow it, hook, line and sinker?
Q. Why did Henry Nowak die?
A. More than 6,000 police officers were brainwashed by compulsory “Inclusion
Matters” indoctrination training. Officers and l/e staff were massively brainwashed:
<><>indoctrinated about not being racist,
<><>bullied wrt harboring “unconscious” bias against non-white killers (like Digwa)
<><>duped into monumental crime-creating stupidities
<><>trained not to be law-enforcers
<><>deluded into police being an “ally” of law-breakers.
<><>to avoid being “intolerant” of perpetrators and criminals
<><>trained to be “impartial” at all crime scenes.
“The video shows him grabbing the police officer’s arm before moving into the street.”
The video shows the officers grabbing his shirt and pulling him out into the street. Of course, he grabbed the man’s arm to steady himself.
Are you people just freaking stupid or just trying to be assholes?
“Why didn’t the person FILMING provide us the answer? Hmmmm?”
Hmmmm. For all we know, he did. The video is clipped.
The Brits gave up their guns. The police are able to do things like this because they have no fear of being shot.
So WHY did he clip what happened immediately prior? Think about the ICE protests and how often it turns out someone provoked the incident. Why show just a few seconds? Why TRUST someone showing just a few seconds?
Provoke???
The only way that could have happened is that he said something they did not like. That would not justify their response.
Again, again, I am mystified how many people are coming out of the woodwork taking up for the beating.
If you were that man, would you say the same thing? Would you be that excruciatingly objective?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.