[nathanbedford]

I acknowledge your devotion to Israel and your fidelity to our obligation we owe to Israel because of our long-standing legal and historical commitments. I share that sense that we owe Israel.

It is sad that such righteous sense of commitment does not extend to Ukraine. Indeed, it is Ukraine, but not Israel under my proposal, that has been "abandoned." Our commitment to Ukraine by word, deed and legal writ is very real too.

The idea that we abandon Israel when we embrace them, grant them citizenship and welcome them into our land as partners is absurd. To call that an abandonment is to say that our commitment to Israel extends not to the people but to the real estate.

The survival of the real estate may be important to Zionists, but it is not a moral imperative of the United States nor is it in our national interest when the risk can be averted at no cost to the lives of the Israelis.

[Lurker]

“It is sad that such righteous sense of commitment does not extend to Ukraine.”

That’s because Ukraine is a hyper corrupt oligarchy run by criminals.

“The idea that we abandon Israel when we embrace them, grant them citizenship and welcome them into our land as partners is absurd.”

What about the ones who don’t want to come here? You forgot that part. I posed that specifically. Why didn’t you respond to that?

Then there’s the whole Samson Option which you completely ignored…

Why is that?

L