Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BeauBo

The one proposed back then was very substantial and opposed, even by the BP union.


11 posted on 05/10/2026 1:31:45 PM PDT by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

“The one proposed back then (2012) was very substantial”

Still like comparing apples to oranges. This is not just a wall.

In the first Trump Administration, Congress required extensive design analysis that delayed funding for a long time. Lots of engineers studying it, prototype flyoffs and red teams attacking designs. The result is what they called “Border Wall System” (now called “Smart Wall).

It is a comprehensive package that addresses the “Border Wall Calculus” of how long different breaching methods require in different terrain, what is required to reliably detect them, and time required for effective response, vs. the “disappearing time” for breachers at any give location (minutes to get away in the city, some rural areas without roads require days).

They looked at tunnelling under, cutting, ramming or blasting through, and climbing or flying over. The resulting package includes newly designed super barrier, all weather access road, and multiple systems of sensors and monitors, all tied into AI monitoring assisting the watch officer in the command posts.

This design is to achieve full operational control, not just help.


15 posted on 05/10/2026 1:52:15 PM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson