Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Washington just became the first state in U.S. history to terminate a public employee pension plan." "I sacrificed my body and a good chunk of my life for our state, they committed to providing a benefit for me and raided it."
x.com ^ | May 6, 2026 | Shane Kidwell @shanerkidwell

Posted on 05/06/2026 12:06:06 PM PDT by ransomnote

Shane Kidwell
@shanerkidwell

·
5h
Washington just became the first state in U.S. history to terminate a public employee pension plan.

The plan belongs to retired police officers and firefighters. LEOFF Plan 1 was 160% funded as of June 2024 per the state's own actuarial valuation. It had not required a single contribution in 25 years. By 2029 it was projected to reach 200% funded with a $4.3 billion surplus.

The legislature terminated the plan, swept $3.9 billion, and is using $880 million of it to refill a rainy day fund it already drained to cover a deficit it created.

Days ago, retired first responders including former Congressman Dave Reichert sued the state to stop it. The bill passed the House 55-39 and was advanced out of Appropriations without a public hearing. Every yes vote was a Democrat. The governor signed it in April.

I publish the full research and sourced breakdowns on Substack every week. Search Shane Kidwell if you want the deeper dive.

I sacrificed my body and a good chunk of my life for our state, they committed to providing a benefit for me and raided it.

@GovBobFerguson

@komonews

@KIRO7Seattle

@KING5Seattle

@fox13seattle

@seattletimes



TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: democrats; misleadingtitle; pension; retirement; theft

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: Leaning Right

The plan was almost 200% funded WITHOUT employee contributions. In another time, I was a pension rep for my city’s fire/police pension plan. We contributed a % of pay commensurate with benefit changes made to the plan to benefit retirees. We always knew never get to a point where you don’t contribute to the plan, no matter how well investments do for this very reason. This Washington plan reportedly hadn’t required contributions for 25 years. That’s just a flashing neon sign to corrupt politicians to do exactly what they did


81 posted on 05/06/2026 5:52:18 PM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

I beg to differ having contributed 6-9% of my pay every year for the length of my career.


82 posted on 05/06/2026 5:54:00 PM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

This is true, which is why when funding got high, pension plans would try to increase benefits for plan members at no cost to the taxpayers…surplus funds from good investment years paid for it.


83 posted on 05/06/2026 5:59:52 PM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
And I’m guessing you were required to pour a huge chunk of your paycheck into that pension plan while you were working, and then saw your Social Security benefit significantly reduced when you retired.

And that’s not a wild guess.

84 posted on 05/06/2026 6:01:30 PM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

The only conclusion I have is that not enough grift was paid to politicians...................


85 posted on 05/06/2026 6:02:20 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued, but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

https://www.pbgc.gov/workers-retirees/learn/how-pension-plans-end


86 posted on 05/06/2026 6:07:16 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued, but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

I worked for a private company who did away with their pension plan but I was also given a healthy chunk of $$ that I rolled over to my 401k. I suspect that’s what will happen. The Washington politicians better hope they’re never in need of those services.


87 posted on 05/06/2026 6:15:24 PM PDT by Mean Daddy (Who will do the Democrat voting that Americans won’t do? - rightwingcrazy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I live here....there has been about 2 state wide elected officials that were pubs and one of them joined the buyden administration....


88 posted on 05/06/2026 6:19:06 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

In past the police (see: UK; COVID) diligently cracked down on the people and sheltered leftist rioters on command in large part because the have families to care for and pensions to keep.

Even the tinpot dictators knew not to mess with the people who physically keep you in power.


89 posted on 05/06/2026 6:25:18 PM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: daler
"And I’m guessing you were required to pour a huge chunk of your paycheck into that pension plan while you were working, and then saw your Social Security benefit significantly reduced when you retired."

When I began in Tier I of the pension plan in 1965, there was no mandatory contribution to the pension fund. After my break in service to have kids and stay home with them, once I went back to work, I ended up in Tier 3 of the same pension plan. 3% of my paycheck was taken every two weeks for the pension fund. Because we had already paid taxes on that amount when we earned it, we don't pay State taxes on our monthly pension...just Federal taxes.

The State Legislature of NY passed a social security offset Bill many years ago for uniformed Correctional employees so that our social security benefits would not be reduced upon retirement. I get the maximum allowed based on my earnings, and the State also reimburses me every month for my Medicare cost.

90 posted on 05/06/2026 6:58:19 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ripnbang

But is it invested? Or does it go straight to the public fund? Are those invested?

Curious.


91 posted on 05/06/2026 7:25:47 PM PDT by Fledermaus ("It turns out all we really needed was a new President!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: oldtech

Agree karma


92 posted on 05/07/2026 6:15:16 AM PDT by Vaduz (NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

Invested into the fund, which were then invested with fund managers that were held accountable by the retirement board (hiring/firing) based on their performance. That 6-9 percent represented our “skin in the game” (albeit negligible in the grand scheme of things) and gave us more control than non-contributory systems that are solely run by elected officials where the employees have no say.


93 posted on 05/07/2026 7:39:25 AM PDT by ripnbang ("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man, a subject.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

My point was that, putting the SS funds into gov’t bonds was a prudent thing to do when the alternative is to leave the cash idle and earn no interest. Later, they didn’t even use the slight of hand of buying Treasuries...they just put the funds into the revenue pool.


94 posted on 05/07/2026 9:28:54 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

My guess is Washington State canceled the pension fund, took the proceeds and moved it to a bigger fund. Cops and firefighters are not going to lose pensions.


95 posted on 05/07/2026 9:49:44 AM PDT by EVO X ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: econjack

No, the SS surplus always went into Treasuries and that didn’t stop until recently when receipts fell below expenditures.

The idea that the SS funds earned interest only extended the fiction that SS funds were invested. It is like making a loan to yourself and paying interest to yourself. A gimmick.


96 posted on 05/07/2026 1:06:30 PM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson