Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sit-rep

I dont catch the drift... why would you need constant propulsion for 2.6 years? Propel to get to speed, do a 180 and propel to stop. ...and where are they going to put 2.6 years worth of fuel no matter how efficient the thrusters are?

It’s all a matrer of force=mass x accelleration. Lithium is heavier/denser than, say, hydrogen, and if it is being ejected at much higher speeds than a chemical rocket so you don’t need as much of it.


10 posted on 05/02/2026 4:55:45 AM PDT by The Antiyuppie (When small men cast long shadows, it is near the end of the day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: The Antiyuppie

23,000 hours worth of Burn?? you cant convince me this system is THAT efficient.

If you cant answer my question, say nothing.


12 posted on 05/02/2026 5:36:45 AM PDT by sit-rep (START DEMANDING INDICTMENTS NOW!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson