Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: econjack

“Instead of higher welfare payments when the father is NOT present, how ‘bout lower payments when the father isn’t present.”

Perhaps limit welfare to a mother and her offspring to five years maximum for the set if a child of hers conceived out of wedlock winds up on welfare.

The limitation would not apply to Medicaid for the children or to prenatal or birthing care for the mother.

Another thing would be to reduce benefits over time for things like SNAP, Section 8 and the PPACA. Benefits might get reduced by 1% per month while on the program and the percentage reductions would get reduced by 2% a month when off the program.

100%
99%
98%
97%
....
37%
39%
41%
...
99%
100%

The safety net would still be there, but its size would get reduced monthly. Working would gradually restore its size over time.


23 posted on 04/24/2026 7:34:58 AM PDT by Brian Griffin (Ask your Congressman to tax tariff refunds at 100% & rebate ~$600 to each insured vehicle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Brian Griffin

I like them. Congress wouldn’t because it would cost them votes. Congress is only interested in what gets them re-elected, not what’s good for the country.


60 posted on 04/24/2026 11:58:29 AM PDT by econjack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson