Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SmokingJoe

“SpaceX had nothing to do with Artemis 2.”

That is for sure. Most people do not know that the 4 main engines on the SLS were not only space shuttle technology, they were used shuttle engines. The oldest was 42 years old and they all flew before on shuttles. In principle, I am not opposed to this. The shuttle engines were very good and it makes sense to leverage this technology. But they should have been able to bring this monstrosity in for far less money and in far less time. At least, the Artemis spacecraft seems to be working better than it’s cousin, the Starliner. Good new for the people who are riding in it.


4 posted on 04/07/2026 3:08:46 AM PDT by beef (The pendulum will not swing back. It will snap back. Hard.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: beef

At least, the Artemis spacecraft seems to be working better than it’s cousin, the Starliner.


The Artemis “spacecraft” is called the Orion capsule. Artemis is the name of the mission.

Boeing’s Starliner capsule is a death trap and will likely never see use again.


9 posted on 04/07/2026 8:06:05 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson