It isn’t “under the jurisdiction”... it’s “subject to the jurisdiction.”
The first would apply to just about anyone as you place yourself under the jurisdiction of local laws by your presence. That’s how the Left views the 14th Amendment. The second refers to a status of citizenship. In language, the British are subjects of the crown while Americans are citizens of the United States. Location doesn’t change this.
“The first would apply to just about anyone as you place yourself under the jurisdiction of local laws by your presence. “
Yes, the wording is important and your correct. However, from a standpoint the ‘invaders’ have not placed themselves under local law or authority. From my standpoint, if you invade a nation (with force or sneak in) your not ‘Subject to’ or ‘Under’ the jurisdiction. Only if your caught do you fall under that ‘Jurisdiction’. If your caught and going through ‘due process’ your Subject to Consequences, but are only ‘temporarily’ here. The understanding would be simpler for Americans if we called those here not ‘Undocumented’ or ‘Illegal’ but what they really are ‘Foreign Invaders’.
To be “subject to the jurisdiction, requires government approval.