[Political Junkie Too]

You noticed I struck it out. You should have also considered the context of our prior conversation, which you apparently didn't and seem to be taking each interaction in isolation instead of building upon our prior back and forths.

None of what you're questioning has anything to do with the manner or time of the election, which was the part you cited in your initial post 23 rebuttal.

You questioned "place" but the issue of this thread is "time." I don't understand what you're still questioning when "time" is what Congress CAN regulate and the state, with extending mail-in ballot receipt, is clearly encroaching on the "time" that Congress already established as the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November.

-PJ

[Alas Babylon!]

No, I understand the time and the manner clauses. It was said in the original article that the House had time, place and manner, while the senate only had time and manner. Not so?