Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sirius Lee

Bombadil’s inclusion in the books was only done by Tolkien at the behest of his kids, or grandkids, because they loved the character so much from previous bedtime stories. Bombadil’s character would have been a bit incongruent with the flow of the movie’s storyline, added a great deal of expense and, more importantly, added a great deal of time, to an already long, long movie for a tangent that really led nowhere.
Tom is an interesting fellow, for sure, but a smart move by Peter Jackson.


16 posted on 03/25/2026 5:29:00 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: ArtDodger

Tom is central to the meaning of the story. A forest being who loved nature and his wife’s big knockers.


17 posted on 03/25/2026 5:32:04 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: ArtDodger

Curious: How do you know that?


19 posted on 03/25/2026 5:41:28 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson