Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: alloysteel

Ok. It is 25% of production. Is there a way to invest and expand the output of the other 75%. One man’s disaster may prove to be another man’s opportunity?


9 posted on 03/21/2026 4:21:46 AM PDT by Kudsman (Volunteer white preservationist )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Kudsman

“Is there a way to invest and expand the output of the other 75%.”

Yes, but that typically takes 3-5 years.


31 posted on 03/21/2026 6:57:37 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Annnd....I voted for this too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Kudsman

“Is there a way to invest and expand the output of the other 75%. One man’s disaster may prove to be another man’s opportunity?“

Virtually all of these older LNG plants only got built once long term supply contracts got inked. Guessing here, but 90% of capacity was committed. The rest of capacity would go into the lucrative spot market. Once they were operating, every knob was tweaked to maximize production. Smaller add on projects usually get looked at to produce a few % more, as long as they don’t require prolonged shutdown.

Some of the newer US LNG plants may be getting built based without long term contracts. These are simpler projects because they draw off of existing gas pipeline system. In either case, it would be economic injustice not to be producing flat out already.


32 posted on 03/21/2026 7:06:24 AM PDT by stateofit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson