Posted on 03/12/2026 6:46:23 AM PDT by RandFan
@RLibertyCaucus
The Republican Liberty Caucus proudly endorses Thomas Massie in KY-4
The swamp is after @MassieforKY because he’s the most honest, principled person in Congress. He’s an unwavering fighter for liberty and a smaller constitutional government. We must reelect this liberty warrior!
As many Republicans in Congress abandon their campaign promises to go along with the D.C. swamp, @MassieforKY is one of the few still fighting for liberty.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Except it wasn’t ‘brought up randomly’ - nor was it a ‘smear.’ Your principles and motives for posting are a topic on every thread. You aren’t recanting or changing your mind about anything so it obviously is accurate...you aren’t even claiming it isn’t - otherwise you would say so. Not liking things being pointed out does not equate to a ‘smear’.
You respond to nothing and pretend you didn’t see the counterpoints made and act like no concerns are legitimate and just keep posting and not responding to direct questions posed to you and act like from thread to thread legitimate, relevant information wasn’t previously brought up.
Unlike many people I don’t hurl insults like calling you “scum”, etc. I try to get something of substance out of you repeatedly, to no avail. You actually showed up to a thread about Massie’s apparent lack of principles and didn’t even respond to the subject of the article as asked - just said “Massie will be fine” as though his political fortunes were the only thing you consider, not whether or not he is genuine. What are people supposed to think other than you are just being a propagandist? Your motives and purpose are legitimately in question.
“”Yes, just stop interfering in America’s elections by posting propaganda. Are you sure you’re not a CIA asset?””
***
He’s not bright enough to be an asset, even for government. He’s just a zealot with too much free time on his hands (unemployed, for ‘some’ reason) and stumping for the anti-Trump agenda morons... probably posting in mommy’s basement while mommy does his laundry and makes him a sammich and tells him what a good boy he is...lol.
And there was nothing ‘off topic’ about it. It was quite on topic in the context of what, and the person’s post, I was responding to. Everyone keeps asking him or challenging him on why he posts and what his motives are for doing so and showing he has past, similar behavior with other politicians is obviously relevant.
And other things I would post, and have posted, on any thread about a certain subject posted by anyone, including my very own threads...how the heck is that an “attack”? Because he doesn’t like that it doesn’t correspond to a narrative?
Fair enough if you want to engage in an adult discussion that’s good but if pasting about Galloway in a thread like this it doesn’t make sense to me and it’s decidedly off-topic, is it not?
You don't have to be bright to be a CIA asset. They're more inclined to hire nazis, commies, pedophiles, homos, gang members, crime bosses, and other riff-raff off the street.
“”Yesssss.... A nice endorsement and some kind words from the RLC””
***
Who gives a damn about an endorsement from ANY outfit that lauds another “maverick McCain-type” obstructionist (Democrat assistant) that works against the Trump agenda? You do, for one. Not that anyone is surprised, mind you.
And by supporting and lauding these cretins that thwart the Trump/MAGA agenda, YOU are proving that you are also against the Trump/MAGA agenda. All your feigning of innocence and pretending otherwise is fooling nobody.
This article just came out yesterday and it is pertinent to the BS you are spreading here... so don’t you even think you’re gonna use that baloney “off topic” excuse with me. Puhleeeze.
Who’s ‘the worst person’? Trump trashes maverick Massie on visit to his state
President Donald Trump blasted fellow Republican Rep. Thomas Massie in his Kentucky district as the “worst person” and “a total disaster,” as the president demanded loyalty from GOP lawmakers who hold narrow majorities in the House and Senate.
“”You don’t have to be bright to be a CIA asset. They’re more inclined to hire nazis, commies, pedophiles, homos, gang members, crime bosses, and other riff-raff off the street.””
***
Valid point that is accurate now. But... back in the day, before the CIA was fundamentally transformed into a not-funny joke... they actually used to hire and employ smart/bright people. I speak from personal experience.
Crazy talk. I can’t believe you’re serious.
Massie lifted the Debt Ceiling so crazy old Joe could do all the Woke spending the Dems have dreamed about. Massie was the deciding Vote.
He’s one of the Squad.
Teh procedural rule made other rules changes that were objectionable. He voted FOR the bill and his enemies continued to lie about it.
Most of it is just Freepers spewing their anti-Massie belefs, and they’ve already been caught on this veyr thread lying about him.
Yes. Not to mention everything in post 41 above.
Don't try to confuse us - you said that in response to post 41, not what other people were saying.
I believe it was a temporary suspension of the rules for this specific vote. The only reason why the rule change for this specific vote would be objectionable to Massie is if the bill was objectionable to Massie.
Add to that, the three other valid reasons why one would think Massie voted against the bill:
Skepticism of Effectiveness: He publicly questioned the bill's practical impact, noting that noncitizens who were going to vote were "already registered" weeks before the election and that the act "ain't going to save anything".
Initial Procedural Resistance: During key votes in early 2026, Massie was one of the few Republicans who initially voted "nay" on advancing the legislation. This forced Republican leaders to keep the vote open to convince him and other holdouts to change their minds.
Nobody honestly thought he voted against it except those deliberately misled. He even announced he wsa voting for it.
I’m not the one trying to confuse people here. Most of those links were just Freepers blowing off their opposition to Massie. That’s a fact.
That is absolutely false.
You are *not* telling the truth.
The fact is that the procedural rule also allowed quickie votes on spending bills without the usually required 24-hour notice. Taht just makes it easier to pass more spending.
And that’s what Massie objected to, as he said numerous times.
🔥 Clarifying the confusion on Rep. Thomas Massie and the SAVE America Act!
Massie just posted: “I just voted YES on the SAVE America Act” – requiring voter ID nationwide to protect election integrity. He also backed a similar bill that passed in April 2025. Now pushing the Senate to act!
But prior reports had some folks claiming he was the lone Republican “no” vote… Turns out that was on a procedural rule to advance the bill (which suspended normal House rules and allowed quick votes on spending without 24-hour notice).
Massie voted NO on the rule itself, but made clear: “There’s a false rumor that I voted against the Save America Act today… I’ll vote for it when it comes to the floor.”
He’s consistent on the substance – supports voter ID and proof of citizenship – but sticks to his principles on process and transparency. The bill advanced narrowly (216-215 on the rule), and final passage looks imminent.
Great to see him set the record straight! 🇺🇸 Election security matters.
#TheSaveAct #voterid #ThomasMassie #TrumpAdministration
“”Great to see him set the record straight! 🇺🇸 Election security matters.””
***
He can set the record straight (too little, too late) all he wants to ‘now’. Trump has his number, good & plenty and Trump’s take on Massie is good enough for me.
“President Donald Trump blasted fellow Republican Rep. Thomas Massie in his Kentucky district as the “worst person” and “a total disaster,” as the president demanded loyalty from GOP lawmakers who hold narrow majorities in the House and Senate.”
““He’s the worst person,” Trump said of Massie at a rally at Verst Logistics in Hebron, Kentucky. “Massie is a complete and total disaster as a congressman and frankly as a human being.””
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.