White Slave Trade

Nazism and Bolshevism—the ideological world scourges of the twentieth century, threatening the complete destruction of Europe—may be buried as historical phenomena. However, the world does not stand still. And the enemies of the “open society,” as described by Karl Raimund Popper, never rest for long; they are always on the move, plotting and calculating. Some of them are skilled at ingratiating themselves and pose as humanists, pretentiously speaking on behalf of the “victims” of the world, but they are impostors, to be sure—and totalitarians at heart. Whatever the rhetoric, their ultimate goal is invariably to overthrow the West.

As a belligerent, triumphant, and unapologetic ally of modern Marxism (i.e., an opportunistically adapted offshoot of classical Marxism-Leninism), which has infiltrated Western universities and news media, occasionally referred to as “wokeism” and wrongly believed to be a benign revisionist trend, though secretly allied with black-clad stormtroopers, civilization is challenged by Islamic totalitarianism. When it comes to totalitarian ideologies that have threatened or continue to threaten Western civilization, the “big three” are National Socialism, Communism, and Islamism.

The contemporary Western intellectual and cultural landscape fixates obsessively on the historical sins of Europe and its settler societies, particularly the triad of (a) racism, (b) colonialism, and (c) slavery. This preoccupation, relentlessly amplified in universities, media, and progressive discourse, typically frames Western civilization as uniquely culpable for systemic evils. Yet this narrative is not merely selective; it is also ideologically weaponized. And deeply flawed.

The assault on Western (Judeo-Christian) values—individual liberty, secular rationalism, and Enlightenment-derived universalism—is spearheaded by a pragmatic alliance between Marxists and Islamists. Despite profound theological and philosophical incompatibilities, these forces converge in implacable hatred towards the West. Their common ground lies not in shared doctrine but in the simplified militaristic propaganda image of the West as an existential enemy

The population in the U.S. from the last census is 343,603,404
The population from 1990 was 248,709,873
The number of new citizens since 1990 is 25,000,000
We have 69,893,631 non-citizens.
In FY 2024, the U.S. issued over 9 million visas.
The number of people dying in the U.S. is larger than the number born.

20 percent of people, 1 out of 5, are non-citizens.
Those people that sat during the State of the Union represent those 20 percent non-citizens.
The people that impeached President Trump represent those non-citizens.
The people that didn’t fund FEMA don’t represent Americans.
They are the same people that didn’t vote for the Laken Riley Act or to condemn Colorado’s antisemitism.
They are America’s enemy within.

DEI was an attack on American White men, merit based opportunities and capitalism.
People that came here on student or tech worker visas are educated.
But many of the non-citizens in the U.S. are illiterate benefitting from government handouts.

Illegal immigrants could lose public housing under Trump HUD plan to end Clinton-era loophole
Fox News ^ | 2/26/26 | Charles Creitz
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/illegal-immigrants-could-lose-public-housing-trump-hud-plan-end-clinton-era-loophole

A proposed Department of Housing and Urban Development rule would crack down on illegal immigrants or unqualified people living in public housing, closing a loophole established amid major departmental reforms under President Bill Clinton in 1996.

Current HUD rules allow “mixed-status” households to use public housing under what is called the “do not contend” provision, in which a person living among a public housing family can declare they “do not contend” their HUD eligibility under their immigration status, and the family instead receives prorated housing assistance.

The HUD-ineligible family member or members may remain in public housing so long as the family accepts their diminished subsidies, according to reports.

The new HUD rule, proposed this week under Secretary Scott Turner, would eliminate the option for residents to say they “do not contend” and instead require every member to verify citizenship or prove eligible noncitizen status to continue receiving housing assistance.

The proposed rule would not categorically prohibit noncitizens from public housing, but those remaining would have to prove they are eligible for taxpayer-funded assistance.

While illegal immigrants would be barred, green-card holders are fully eligible under federal housing law.

People admitted to the U.S. under official refugee or asylee status also remain eligible, as well as individuals whose DHS order of removal is being legally withheld due to threat of personal harm in their home country.

Cuban emigres who have fled the Communist dictatorship 90 miles off Key West have also historically been considered eligible, as have certain foreign domestic violence or trafficking victims.

Turner’s proposal, however, would guarantee that all people living in HUD-funded housing are eligible under statute.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.