You would mitigate his treasonous actions with the idea that what he knew was not significant. I reject the defense as it ignores the betrayal for gain he committed if found guilty.
You also assume the planes like the F-15 are somehow no longer relevant, yet it is still a significant component in our military. Just because it has age does not mean all its capabilities are known to the enemy, that is a false assumption.
Your argument only serves to embolden future traitors if it were to be given any credibility and has no bearing on his intent.
You put a lot of words in other peoples mouths.
And you’re clearly interested in seeing violence done to others. I’ve seen your screen name a lot lately for some reason, and that trend is clear.
If this guy’s been doing wrong (as the article clearly suggests), lets see what the evidence brings to his trial. Then let the duly authorized governing body make the call.
This whole trend of people who claim to be conservative seemingly rushing to their impulse for violent punishment, before any due process - very disturbing.
That is the sort of thing the godless left does.