Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rxh4n1
The root of thesecession movement was not about taxes and tariffs. It was slavery.

Well that *IS* the constant propaganda, and people look around for evidence to support it. They ususually settle on the 3 or 4 secession statements made by a few of the minor states, and ignore the fact the other 7 states did not make such statements.

They also ignore the fact the Northern dominated congress voted *FOR* the Corwin amendment which made slavery permanently legal in the United States.

For some reason, the Southern states didn't seem to care that the Northern states voted for permanent slavery in the United States, so this would imply that "slavery" wasn't really the issue that was motivating them to escape from the North.

On the other hand, it is now obvious that becoming independent would gain the Southern states an immediate 65 Million dollars per year in money pumped into their economy rather than going to Washington DC. Additionally, they would get out from under the laws that required them to use Northern shipping to ship their products to Europe. They would also get out from laws that required them to buy Northern products, or pay hefty penalties for buying the better quality European products.

All in all, there was approximately a 700 million dollar per year benefit for them to leave the Union, and say what you want, I think most people vote their wallet.

Why would any of them not want an additional 700 million per year coming into their pockets?

43 posted on 02/13/2026 7:27:32 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp

“They also ignore the fact the Northern dominated congress voted *FOR* the Corwin amendment which made slavery permanently legal in the United States.”

Yes, but only in the states where it already existed. That was just confirming the government had no Constitutional power to intefere with slavery WHERE IT EXISTED.
Right, it was about tariffs. A debate about tariffs made Prston Brooks so angry he invaded the Senate and bat down Charles Sumner, and Congressmen were carrying weapons in the Capitol because the tariff debate was so contentious. Just stop with the green eyeshade stuff. Arguing about tariffs wasn’t going to cause the anger and bitterness caused by slavery.


55 posted on 02/13/2026 6:59:52 PM PST by rxh4n1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson