Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockingham
The claim does not stand because it places a great deal of weight on a thin reed. In truth, secession would not have been undertaken if it was thought likely to lead to the end of slavery.

Of course it stands up. What does not stand up is that 94+% of White Southerners voted to secede in order to protect the property of 6% who owned slaves....even though slavery was not threatened in the US and even though the union government went miles out of its way to make it clear that slavery was not threatened within the US.

What makes much more sense is they felt they were being screwed economically and wanted out.

415 posted on 03/27/2026 7:39:49 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies ]


To: FLT-bird

The right to vote was restricted in the Antebellum South to substantial property holders, which commonly meant slaveholders. And slavery was integral to the South’s economy, even for non-slaveholders. Similarly, I do not own an oil well, but I want them to keep pumping.


419 posted on 03/27/2026 8:05:48 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson