Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rxh4n1
Slavery was not just about cotton. That’s a tired stereotype.

I assume you like money? Most people like money. I think the Southern slave holders back in the 1850s liked money too, so I think they would do whatever brought them the most value for their effort.

Slaves cost around $1,000.00 in 1850 money, which is roughly equivalent to $100,000.00 today. If you have the choice between growing wheat or cotton, you would be a d@mned fool if you chose wheat. The money was in cotton. That's why it was the dominant use of slaves in that era.

People in that era were not stupid. They would not waste slaves in Kansas when they could make higher profits by using them in Mississippi or Louisiana.

41 posted on 02/13/2026 7:20:19 AM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
I assume you like money? Most people like money.


42 posted on 02/13/2026 7:22:25 AM PST by dfwgator ("I am Charlie Kirk!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp
People in that era were not stupid. They would not waste slaves in Kansas when they could make higher profits by using them in Mississippi or Louisiana.

So there we re a bunch of stupid slave owners in Maryland , Kentucky, Delaware, and saintly ol Virginia? Hummmm?y

46 posted on 02/13/2026 7:59:00 AM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson