Posted on 01/19/2026 2:32:59 AM PST by RandFan
@SenRandPaul
Everything about the Anthony Fauci pardon is preposterous. Iām working closely with @SecKennedy on my investigation and am prepared for the @DOJ to act on Fauci for lying to Congress and deleting official records.
(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...
Well.. similar picture then.
Either way Bondi has done little a that can be put down as victories... I searched and asked several AI’s and this is what they came up with:
As of now, there have been few notable indictments under Pam Bondi since her appointment as Attorney General in February 2025.
Here are the key cases that have emerged:
Name/Charges Details
Joel David Forney Sex Trafficking and Related Charges Convicted in August 2025 in a federal jury trial in New York.
Chen Zhi (Vincent) Multiple Charges, including Fraud and Labor Abuse Charged in October 2025 for operating a forced labor scheme and fraud.
James Comey Indicted for various alleged acts His indictment was later DISMISSED due to improper appointment of the prosecutor. (Not directly under Bondi but related.)
Letitia James Indicted for alleged misconduct Similar situation as Comey’s case; also DISMISSED due to issues with the indictment process.
That’s because-—as Randy knows-—Fallacy has a pardon. There is no lawyer that I’ve read on any side that thinks this can be undone.
So, as always, the Randy one huffs, puffs, investigates, and does nothing.
He’s working with Kennedy. Great. I love ol’ John, but he doesn’t ever DO anything either. All these guys do is tweet, make videos, but let me know when Randy has assembled a coalition of enough Senators to actually do anything. He can’t and won’t cuz compromise violates “muh principles.”
Well done for that it’s in the fine and irreverent tradition of FR. Jim will be smiling
Get it on twitter/X.
You’r’e right the pardon is a blocker but he thinks it needs challenging unless you think it’s just improbable
There are also his cohorts to go after I dont think they all got pardons? I dont remember!
š¢
Bondi works for Trump. If obviously, at some level, approves of what she does.
And Trump appointed her and he obviously does not want to fire her...he could if he wanted.
HE (not:If”) obviously, at some level, approves of what she does.
“Trump appointed her and he obviously does not want to fire her...he could if he wanted.”
He needs to get rid of her. The longer he keeps her, the more he looks ridiculous, and he loses credibility. It’s been an effing YEAR and no significant arrests have been made.
And now the Clintons are calling his bluff.
Whatever, Karen
All you do is complain about everything
Thank you for noticing. š I was raised with high standards. I complain when crap is obvious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.