Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pierrem15

I enjoyed the movie up to the very predictable supernatural reveal that I’ll avoid spoiling for those who haven’t seen it yet. Stuff like that ruins a picture for me, but the rest of the movie is well done and worth watching.


2 posted on 01/17/2026 1:37:47 PM PST by Orosius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Orosius
I had a similar feeling of disappointment about the ending, too, after I first watched it. But I've realized the point was to make me think about what happens in the movie, and now I have a better appreciation for it.

I think the main problem is that the supernatural elements are introduced too quietly and then it's shocking. But since the film is shot from the characters' perspective, maybe that's part of the point.

6 posted on 01/17/2026 1:51:00 PM PST by pierrem15 ("Massacrez-les, car le seigneur connait les siens" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Orosius

bookmark


11 posted on 01/17/2026 2:23:16 PM PST by DFG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Orosius
I enjoyed the movie up to the very predictable supernatural reveal that I’ll avoid spoiling for those who haven’t seen it yet.

I don't mind spoiling it for everybody. He wakes up at the end and realizes it was all just a dream.

And in the ending credits, right after it says "The End", a question mark appears.

And you're like, whaaaat?"

You're welcome.

15 posted on 01/17/2026 2:59:33 PM PST by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Orosius

I read a review that said it was like “Apololyspe Now” only in a tank and with a worse ending. I think that is a pretty good summation.


20 posted on 01/17/2026 4:08:06 PM PST by skyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Orosius
Strange a Mark 6 Tiger Tank would be sent on such a long trip.

That thing drank fuel like no tomorrow.

29 posted on 01/17/2026 6:27:12 PM PST by jmacusa ( Liberals. Too stupid to be idiots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Orosius

SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT..SPOILER ALERT....SPOILER ALERT...SPOILER ALERT...’’’

OK, Fair warning.

It wasn’t a “supernatural” ending.

The entire mission was allegorical, including the opening preamble on the bridge. Did anyone think that the mysterious, unmoving deer on the bridge was something you’d find in the midst of an urban firefight?

I’d suggest that the ending is completely of a piece with the slew of off-kilter scenes leading up to it:

The mirrored massacres in the burning church and the burning factory.

The dying tankmen hinting that the mission was somehow a personal one for his lieutenant.

The tank operating underwater. (Yes, there were some designed for the expected invasion of Britain, but the odds of one appearing on the Eastern Front were slim to nil.)

The proliferation of decayed (some too quickly) corpses throughout.

The dead parachutist hanging from a tree in the middle of a forest.

The bunker in the middle of nowhere, unguarded by a single picket yet containing a massive subterranean world complete with its very own labyrinth (as if the name of the mission anticipated such a structure.)

The lance corporal leading the lieutenant only part of the way to his objective within the bunker, and saying as he does, “Don’t be scared,” and “Have courage,” to an officer(!)

The structure mirrors that used in one of the greatest short stories of all-time, “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge,” by Ambrose Bierce. It doesn’t have the cinematographic clues that “The Tank” has, or the more overt philosophical trappings, but it shares a delayed, surprising resolution. Its text can be found here:

https://www.owleyes.org/text/occurrence-owl-creek-bridge/read/i#root-75217-6

A Frenchman made a short film of it in 1962, and Rod Serling played it in its entirety as an episode of “The Twilight Zone.” It has zero dialogue and is utterly harrowing. Here’s where you can see it:

https://vimeo.com/91150431

By the way, Bierce was a fabulous war writer, a very outspoken atheist, and a practitioner of “trick endings.” Famously, he didn’t like what he called “lazy readers” who had to be spoonfed story lines and easy morality lessons. Based on that, I think he’d have loved “The Tank.”


35 posted on 01/17/2026 9:04:17 PM PST by Miami Rebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson