Liberty is freedom plus morality. That's what you would expect in a country such as the U.S. Founded on Judeo-Christian values and principles.
"Do you think that the further we have gone away from Monarchism we have gained more of it or lost more of it??"
I fail to see anything in 2025 monarchies that indicate we as Americans have lost anything at all worth valuing. Directly to your question, we have gained more. Gained.
I think that the further modern monarchs have gone away from circa 1500s Monarchism they have lost so much of what little respect they may have nominally been meant to deserve.
I can at least in theory understand why someone may find a king from the 1400s to be maybe a slight bit alluring. I dare you to unbind your fake view of trying to compare today's U.S. with kings 1600 years ago and talk about the socialism-embracing kings of 2025.
How about I flip it and talk about how the U.S. at it's founding 250 years ago absolutely SMOKES today's socialism-embracing kings? Let us not forget that today's King Filipe IV in Spain nominated an outright communist for Prime Minister.
Give me the Founding Fathers any day to that BS. The kings are so absolutely smoked it isn't even funny. I can't find a way to laugh at it, it's just pathetic and pitiful.
"Did 18th century England have more or less right to their possessions than we do?
21st century England has less right to their possessions than we do. Monarchism has not remained static.
"Do you think the king required a higher tax rate than our benevolent “elected leaders”?
Yes I do. King John's taxes were so high the common folk invented their own hero who might save them from the onslaught. Yes, I know the actual true history of Robin Hood, not the left wing perversion they created some years ago based on the redistributive model.
"Were more or less hours of a English subject’s daily hours spent in the support of his king compared to our hours spent in support of our government?"
You're working way too hard to avoid modern England. I'm going to make your question fair.
It required more hours of a English subject’s daily hours spent in the support of his king than it did compared to our hours spent in support of the government that the Founding Fathers gave to us at the time of our Founding.
Today? The U.S. in 2025 still has more private property rights and is required less hours than an English subject in 2025. We always win.
"Try not hiring someone because you don’t like the color of their skin."
People in England are going to jail for racist memes, even when the meme isn't actually trying to be racist or set out at all in the concept of race but instead the memes are complaints about government in entirely non race related ways.
Don't talk to me about the superiority of socialist England when you know as well as I do that the Fabians destroyed the place.

"Try not hiring someone because you don’t like the color of their skin. See what your benevolent Democracy thinks about that liberty."
Try not hiring someone because you don’t like the color of their skin. See what your benevolent Prime Minister thinks about that or Mayor of London.
"Is a king more likely to have fidelity and responsibility to his subjects who were also the subjects of his father and his father’s father and his father’s father going back 20 generations or is a politician more likely to have fidelity and responsibility to the citizens that voted for him one day 2 years ago?"
No. Or else Kings of 2025 would be largely the same as they were centuries ago instead of socialism-embracing kings.
You spout a lot of theory but you seem to be stuck in a time capsule or broken time machine. Every premise that you're proposing is flat out false and ridiculous.
"Kings leave the future kingdom to their progeny and have an in-built motivation for keeping it prosperous, healthy, stable, etc..."
Then they wouldn't be embracing communists.
"In a democracy, when a politician says, “We are going to bring in millions of brown foreigners to replace you.” The citizens look at each other, shrug their shoulders and say, “I guess we voted for this.”"
I agree.
It's a good thing that The United States is a republic, not a democracy.
Oh, and looking at the totalitarian dictator kings of Europe, they say, “We are going to bring in millions of brown foreigners to replace you.” The citizens look at each other, shrug their shoulders and say, “God Bless the King!”
You are talking about impotent, parliamentary monarchies in 2025. That’s not what I’m talking about.
You are looking at monarchies who have abdicated their authority to liberal enlightened “democracies”.
That’s not what I’m talking about. I am talking about RULING CHRISTIAN ABSOLUTE Monarchies.
Funny enough if you look at the few 2025 Monarchies that are not parliamentary Monarchies but instead are Absolute Monarchies (as I am referring to), they DO support their citizens and they DO look out for their best interest. Saudi Arabia, Oman, Brunai, OAE are some of them. None of them have any income taxes. The level of “liberty” in many measurements of liberty is far above ours. Granted, you don’t have the “liberty” to perform sodomy on other men. Girls don’t have the liberty to screw all of the guys in town and many other terrible backward rules.
Of course, these are all Muslim countries so their values are not Christian values but they are doing far better than their “democratic” or parliamentary or war lord ruled neighbors. And one could imagine a Christian Monarchy that would support Christian values and protect and support their citizens the same way the previously mentioned countries support theirs.
And no…taxes were not higher under King George than they are today. There are countless studies proving this.
The number of hours spent in 1785 in support of the King was no where near the amount of hours spent in support of our “liberty supporting democracy”.
You are simply wrong on that point.
You should go back and review your other arguments and instead of comparing impotent 2025 parliamentary monarchies, compare Christian 15th,16th or 17th century monarchies that had not yet been overthrown for governments based on the liberal enlightenment or even compare to 2025 absolute monarchies (assuming the hypothetical ones I would support would be Christian instead of Muslim).