Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: proust

Most winners lose it all in a short time. This women may very likely live another 60 years. That is $52 thousand minus taxes every year. And she gets it through divorce and market up swings and down. She is not paying a broker to manage it. For most people who know nothing about money her choice is just fine. Its a very safe bet. And who knows what the market will do. And how much the government will bite her lump some with taxes through out the years. And frankly, she might understand her own limitations. This is a steady dependable annuity. Nothing wrong with that.


24 posted on 12/20/2025 10:13:42 AM PST by poinq (thics and customs and did not take an oath to the country. And did not follow the country's traditio)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: poinq

“Most winners lose it all in a short time.”

Yup—that is the biggest downside risk.

The thread notes many other risks with the annuity approach—and those are very real.

My wife had that issue with a former employer where she had a modest pension plan. We weighed the pros and cons—made a long list of each.

We decided on the annuity approach—but it was not a slam dunk. It was a close call.


35 posted on 12/20/2025 10:26:29 AM PST by cgbg (The master is nice only when the dog behaves as expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson