Why didn’t the hero shoot maniac Dad, then maniac son?
The aussies are woke liberals like much of the rest of the anglosphere and europe.
the man would have been clapped in jail for firing and killing the muslim guy. then, once in jail he would have been killed by the muslims already in the pokey for going against their muslim brother.
Other possibilities:
Gun was out of ammo or jammed
He didn’t know how to operate the gun
His natural aversion to killing took over once he thought the son was neutralized
He was overwhelmed with adrenaline and wasn’t thinking clearly
Prime minister proposes strengthening Australia’s strict gun laws in wake of Bondi terror attack
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-15/albanese-proposes-tougher-gun-laws-after-bondi-attack/106143310
That was my take. In leftist crapholes like Australia and Maryland, picking up a gun that you removed from an active shooter is probably a felony in itself.
(Yea, they tried to make such a law in Maryland. Any transfer of a firearm, even having a friend shoot your rifle at a range requires a full background check)
As he drew down on the raghead, he was shot in the leg. The shotgun may have also been empty at that point.
Plus he may not have ever fired or even held a gun before and likely didn’t know how.