What BS.
There is no "allegedly" about it.
There is video of it.
Written correctly it would read .....
"Naveed Akram, 24, and his father, 50, opened fire on a Jewish Hanukkah event shortly before 7pm on Sunday, killing at least 15 innocent people and injuring a further 40."
The news media always say “allegedly” about any criminal act. They do this until someone is convicted in a court of law of the criminal act.
I don’t know if they do this for legal reasons, or why this is the case. But to the media, everything that happens is alleged, until someone is convicted.
Naveed Akram, 24, and his father, 50, opened fire on a Jewish Hanukkah event shortly before 7pm on Sunday, killing at least 15 innocent people and injuring a further 40.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
Correct. And in any truly civilized country these two mass murderers would be found guilty and executed within three days of their apprehension. And no testimony regarding “motive” would be admissible at their trial because such testimony would be nothing more than sick theater.
There is video showing two people opening fire. The “allegedly” part is identifying them as someone named Naveed Akram and his father.
“Naveed Akram, 24, and his father, 50, allegedly opened fire on a Jewish Hanukkah event shortly before 7pm on Sunday, killing at least 15 innocent people and injuring a further 40.
What BS.
There is no “allegedly” about it.”
Don’t believe your lyin’ eyes. Watched a moron TV “journalist” use that word this morning as the video played and wondered how he can continue in such an occupation.