Posted on 12/09/2025 8:23:55 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
Here are a several things I would never do if I seriously believed my best friend in the world was brutally murdered as part of a conspiracy...
1. Reveal information from "inside sources" in such a way that would almost certainly get those sources killed if I really believed I was dealing with cold hearted murderers.
2. Slow roll details of my investigation to the public in such a way that would let the people I was investigating on to what I was looking for, where I was looking for it and who I was using inside their organization to find it.
3. Reveal critical information that could lead to their prosecution in such a way that could allow them to destroy, hide or alter evidence before it could be seized.
4. Implicate his wife and mother of his children, who he was madly in love with, without sufficient evidence.
5. Work 24/7 to destroy everything he had spent his life building, without sufficient evidence.
But those are just rules you might follow if you wanted to see his killer/killers brought to justice and protect his legacy and family...
You might do something very different if you had different motivations.
(Excerpt) Read more at facebook.com ...
Here’s the YouTube video, start around the 10-minute mark for the next 6-7 minutes, she goes into the overseas tip she received from a billionaire name Pierre, at first she just uses the term trafficking which I was confused if she meant human trafficking or some other type of trafficking, later she goes into gun trafficking
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kmt6HgRjckU
It could be the onset of schizophrenia. A close friend's brother succumbed to that awful disease.
In the early days, he had visions of grandeur where he was planning on building a manufacturing business, and actually convinced several friends to invest thousands of dollars. It was all in his mind and the friends were never repaid.
Oh lord.
Candace Owens is the Rachel Maddow of the Right.
“tip about TPUSA and Charlie Kirk potentially being involve in international gun running which could be reason he was assassinated.”
LOL! And tomorrow it will be Sasquatch. It’s rubber room time.
“it is entirely reasonable to question her motivations for trying to destroy Charlie Kirk’s legacy.”
There’s a chance she suffers from ultra jealousy of Erika.
Also, SHE is the one loudly proclaiming that she and Charlie were “best friends”. And that SHE is the only one who cares about him. I haven’t heard anyone else say or confirm that. IDK if true, but someone recently pointed out the fact that she and Erika never have met.
If you have a friend, and he hasn’t introduced you to his spouse for four or five years, he’s not your BEST friend.
You’re an idiot
#1 It’s free speech.
#2 No one has successfully sued her for defamation and won.
#3 It’s entertaining.
#4 The “government” account of the murder is total Horse-shit!
It is one thing to identify specific issues and concerns—which are factual and can be falsified by other facts.
It is a totally different thing to claim bad acts without strong evidence supporting those claims.
If someone wants to claim bad actors are working together to do bad acts they need to provide hard evidence—not speculation or theoretical constructs.
Btw—this is the difference between Fuentes and Owens.
When Fuentes makes a claim he brings receipts.
When Owens make a claim she brings innuendo and speculation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.