I don't like this low IQ clown. At all. Nor any in his mongrelized family.
However, I do agree with him that any fascination Americans have with anything British is dumb. Especially with "royalty."
I once was looking at a microfilm of a small-town Virginia newspaper, the Lynchburg Press, from the early 1820s. A lot of space was devoted to the latest news about the British royal family.
Mark Twain in Huckleberry Finn has two con men pretending to be the Duke of Bridgewater and the Dauphin (King Louis XVII of France). Apparently that was inspired partly by a relative's attempt to prove their claim to an inheritance from an English noble family.
I don't either.
BTW, to which one were you referring?
“However, I do agree with him that any fascination Americans have with anything British is dumb. Especially with “royalty.”
I think it’s more the entertainment value.
Benny Hill....Monty Python....Mr Bean....?
I admired and respected Queen Elizabeth. All her progeny have failed her.
“I think it’s more the entertainment value.”
It’s more than that. Despite all the obvious dysfunction, a good number of Americans literally want to *be* part of that royal world. An acquaintance who works in college-applicant guidance at an upscale private high school told me that over the past 15 years there’s been a big surge in American students enrolling at University of St Andrews in Scotland. I asked why. He explained that in most cases their moms are obsessed with St Andrews alumna Kate Middleton and are sending their kids over there literally with the idea of duplicating Kate’s feat of meeting and marrying some royal or royal-adjacent.
Harry..... or Colbert?!
I enjoy learning about British history, and my ancestors on my mother’s side mostly came from England and Wales, but they are dumb like the rest of the Euroweenies.