The SC is going to have to make a choice at some point. How can you have “freedom of religion”, also accommodating a religion hellbent on conquering and domination, when that religion will deny that very right once achieving a position of power?
Everything about this country and its founding and Constitution was under an assumed context of Judeo-Christian beliefs and values. While it doesn’t require you to be of one of those faiths, that is due to choice being a virtue of those religions - where it isn’t with Islam.
Ultimately, the goal of Islam is Sharia Law. There is no distinction between the two. There’s no “Islamists” vs “Muslims”. Regular Muslims never side with anyone but “Islamists”, if you want some sort of distinction. Islam demands; pay the Jizya tax, convert to Islam, or die. Ask them, that is what they’ll tell you is ultimately the “choice” you’ll receive.
While we can’t stop somebody following Islam. Allowing them to build institutions under the Islamic flag must stop. They are incompatible with “freedom of religion”, the antithesis of our foundation.
“Everything about this country and its founding and Constitution was under an assumed context of Judeo-Christian beliefs and values”
Let us say this a way you are afraid to say.
“Everything about this country and its founding and Constitution was under an assumed context of white property owning men’s beliefs and values.”
Politics is ultimately about who not what.