Silver, gold becoming Giffen goods

New York futures out of action probably doesn’t help. But silver hits new highs in volatile conditions. In this report, we look at the factors driving gold and silver higher still.

During Thanksgiving week (US markets closed on Thursday) the bullish running has been made in Asia. In European trade this morning, gold was $4,173, up $90 from last Friday’s close. Silver at $53.85, up $3.87 on the same time scale was making the running. Overnight in Shanghai, spot silver spiked as high as $55.13 surpassing previous highs, and the February future closed at $56.

The situation is complicated by Comex trading halted overnight, it is said due to cooling issues at a data centre. It may or may not have contributed to silver spiking higher. But the real problem in markets is an acute shortage of deliverable silver.

So far this year, 12,834 tonnes have been stood for delivery. As a source of silver bullion, Comex exceeds the combined output of Mexica, China, Peru, and possibly Chile — the world’s four largest producers. We don’t know how much of this is no longer available in the form of market liquidity, but with liquidity clearly stretched it will require higher prices, probably far higher to find out.

The chart below, which shows the relationship between the silver price and open interest encapsulates the problem.

Particularly since the beginning of this year, while silver has been rising open interest has declined. In a reversal of normal supply and demand relationships as the price rises, selling dries up. Normally, we look at speculator activity on the buy side to drive prices. But instead, there is a growing reluctance of sellers to supply additional futures contracts to buyers. That is why speculator interest is declining presumably with quotes widening, despite an obvious bullish momentum which normally attracts hedge fund interest.

The problem is not confined to Comex, with persistent backwardations between London spot and Comex futures, which have only disappeared since the March contract has become active. An additional difficulty for New York and London is that demand is increasing in China, with silver on the Shanghai Futures Exchange (SHFE) closing at $56 for the February contract while bullion stocks in the SGE and SHFE have declined to dangerously low levels. SHFE open interest and volumes are telling the same story as western paper markets, both of which still appear relatively subdued despite a soaring silver price:

Normal supply and demand analysis inadequately explains the situation in silver. After years of price suppression, evidenced by global supply deficits relative to increasing industrial demand, there is a dawning of the consequences. Worse for industrial users long accustomed to cheap supplies, silver has the characteristics of a Giffen good, where a rising price creates further scarcity: the scarcity being the “investor category”, in the Silver Institute’s annual surveys no longer prepared to cover supply deficits from industrial demand.

There is a similar situation in gold, as the next chart of the price and Comex open interest demonstrates:

There have been three phases of the relationship. As the price rallied in the first quarter, speculative interest boomed. That was when it was thought that the newly elected President Trump would impose trade tariffs on US gold imports. Gold then consolidated for about five months while speculative interest declined, only picking up briefly when gold broke out above its consolidation phase. But in late-September, open interest began to decline despite a rising price.

Clearly, gold is not being driven by speculators, but by the paper gold establishment’s attempts not to get caught short.

Gold is a far larger market than silver, but like silver it looks like becoming a Giffen good, as a rising price deters selling and at the margin attracts buyers who are missing out. What it tells us about the relationship between metallic money and fiat currencies is ringing alarm bells. But that topic is beyond a precious metals market analysis.

CDE is my odds on favorite right now.
A strong balance sheet, record earnings, recent acquisition of NewGold, it’s been flying high, and will continue, in my opinion

CDE is another good one. I bought into it about 5 years ago and have been waiting patiently. I also own shares of NGD so look forward to seeing how that acquisition works out. Others are B, AGI, ASM, GFI, KGC, HMY, NEM, AEM, VZLA, and WPM.

I usually don’t bother with OTC stocks but recently have taken another look. Junior Mining Network publishes articles on which small companies are finding new veins and getting new funding. I look for REE stocks as well. One is Graphite One (GPHOF) which shows potential and another is LaFleur Minerals (LFLRF). Those are to hold long term in hopes that my grandchildren will see some returns.

HYMC is worth a look. Sprott bought into it bigly.

I’ll look into that one as well.

It is amazing how right now you can buy a few hundred shares in small mining stocks and potentially double and triple your money in a few months. You don’t have to be a millionaire to take advantage of the spike in precious metals.

Even as little as 5 thousand dollars can be invested to turn into a nice little nest egg. Just research the companies before buying to determine their past performance, leader’s experience, and corporate debt levels. Research, research, research is the key.

Thank you. I was thinking, damn, they must have changed the definition of a Giffen good since I took Econ 1.

You’re right. The textbook example of a Giffen good is rice. For many impoverished folks, rice is like the cheapest staple food out there. But when the price goes up, its most loyal customers may find themselves buying more rice rather than less, as they can no longer afford to vary their diet with more expensive foods.

I can’t wrap my head around how that concept could possibly apply to gold. When the price of gold goes up, I really doubt that many folks are buying more because just because their gold budget is now so high than they can no longer afford some more expensive alternative to gold... palladium or something.

So, no, this ain’t a Giffen good situation. It’s more comparable to a tulip bubble... higher prices attracting more speculation of even higher prices.

Not really. Lacking an adequate supply of gold and silver, Rome debased its currency such that mortgages were traded as investment vehicles and a more reliable store of value. In modern instances, governments lied about their gold holdings as supposed backing for their paper currency.

Moreover, even under a gold standard, if countries accumulate gold and do not issue currency, the result is a deflationary gold squeeze. Such policies by the US and France helped lead to and prolong the Depression, which is a major reason why the world went off the gold standard.

Recent proposals for a broad commodity based monetary base currency standard amplify the opportunity for speculative mischief. Moreover, changes in technology and commodity supply and demand can make such a monetary base more or less valuable. And whomever produces the commodities used as the monetary base gets the benefit of having them with a guaranteed demand.

In reality, there is no universal answer to how to have a reliable monetary base and stable currency value. The classic gold standard worked for that purpose in Europe for about a century because, from 1815 to 1914, Europe was mostly at peace, with increasing free trade, and benefitting from major advances in science and technology. It was a moment in history that made gold glitter all the more. Yet that era is not coming back.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.