Posted on 11/25/2025 6:16:44 AM PST by MtnClimber
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
The Judicial Lawfare battalion of the color revolution conspiracy against President Trump.
Yet another AWFL.
Let’s see HER bank records!
Typical liberal pos human debris.
Who’s the fascists,anyway????
Time to suspend Habeas corpus.
Oh good grief
Why? Because DOJ botched Halligan’s appointment?
The two tiered justice system persists. The federal judiciary is compromised beyond repair. We should put up a sign outside federal courts: “Republicans! Abandon all hope, ye who enter here”
Yet another political judge. Pathetic. She and her ilk are destroying what little trust Citizens have in the judiciary.
Won’t take many for the rest to get it. Party’s over.
Just another Fake democrat judge
Judge Cameron Currie
C.U.N.T. can’t understand normal thinking.
Wake me when something — anything — is done about this never-ending $h!t.
It was payback from judge Aileen Cannon for doing the same thing. That’s the theory from some anyway.
Dershowitz says it’s not dead yet...but it’s complicated.
It was an application of Federal statute. 28 U.S.C. § 546 lays it all out in black and white. Bondi and Trump effed up.
So your reading of 546 is that if the Article II authority doesn’t appoint a replacement within 120 days then they lose the ability to appoint and that authority transfers exclusively to the Article III authority? How is that in any way Constitutional?
In your opinion, is there any way, any possibility whatsoever, that this judge got her interpretation of the statute wrong?
It’s spelled out in black and white. If they want to challenge the Constitutionality of it let them pursue that through the courts. But that will take quite some time, longer than they would have on the Comey case.
OK. So you’re fine with judicial activism and [likely] intentional misinterpretation of a given statute because the process is enough to warrant blowing the case. So be it. There are a LOT of people in this country that prefer no justice rather than see a Trump win on anything.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.