Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SHOCKING UFO findings revealed: ‘WE HAVE PROOF’ (video plus summary of Special Report with Bret Baier interview with David Grusch last night)
youtube.com ^ | 11/21/2025 | Bret Baier and David Grusch

Posted on 11/22/2025 5:10:59 AM PST by RoosterRedux

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-253 last
To: mdmathis6

I don’t believe that any governments have, or have had, ‘bodies’ - or as Grusch sensitively suggests, ‘biologics’.

I’m not from Missouri; but Show Me.


241 posted on 11/22/2025 5:54:17 PM PST by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Jamestown1630

Well I do allow for the possibility it’s all lies...some sort of put on or psy-op.

I’ll join you in “show me “ land!


242 posted on 11/22/2025 7:48:19 PM PST by mdmathis6 (A horrible historic indictment: Biden Democrats plunging the world into war to hide their crimes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

What’s wrong with saying “I’m not buying it”?

Why not? because “seeing is believing”.

“interdimensional” beings is pure nonsense. There is no proof that there are actual, practical, dimensions that are beyond what we can see, touch, and experience every moment of your existence.

If there is something that can change my mind, I’d like to see it, until then, I’m going with “If we have anything at all, it’s got to be that we’ve got the dumbest, laziest aliens who skimp on UFO maintenance, don’t change the oil or check the brakes.

I don’t care how many grainy videos, or how many whistleblowers are interviewed. There is another explanation other than “it’s aliens” for anything that might turn out to be real. We just don’t know it yet.

This is a rational view - fully encapsulated in the efficient language of “I’m not buying it”


243 posted on 11/22/2025 8:09:46 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Clickbait.


244 posted on 11/22/2025 10:03:34 PM PST by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

You’re free to say “I’m not buying it.” The issue is when that gets turned into “anything I can’t personally see is nonsense.” That’s not skepticism — it’s a self-imposed blind spot.

Most of what we accept as real we’ve never seen ourselves: atoms, Wi-Fi, radio waves, subatomic particles, even most countries on a map. We trust evidence, not direct personal experience. So dismissing unseen possibilities on the grounds that you haven’t seen them isn’t a rational standard — it’s an impossible one.

The honest position is simply: “We don’t know what’s going on yet.”

By the way, are you an atheist? Even belief in God is based on trust in realities we don’t see or touch.


245 posted on 11/23/2025 1:42:58 AM PST by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Getready

Bret Baier is “clickbait”? You can do better than that.;-)


246 posted on 11/23/2025 1:45:35 AM PST by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage

Garry Nolan isn’t “a medical doctor.” He’s a world-class Stanford scientist, a leading immunologist, and one of the most cited researchers in his field.

Jacques Vallée isn’t “a guy who saw UFOs.” He’s a computer scientist, co-developer of early internet architecture, and an astronomer who worked on classified tracking systems.

Dismissing their views because they’re not the “right kind” of experts isn’t skepticism — it’s filtering out serious voices because their conclusions make you uncomfortable.

You don’t have to agree with them, but pretending they’re unqualified is simply inaccurate. And dismissing a person’s argument by diminishing their background isn’t skepticism — it’s an ad hominem. If you want to critique their conclusions, address the reasoning, not the resume.


247 posted on 11/23/2025 2:02:50 AM PST by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
BTW, before you accuse me of supporting the interdimensional hypothesis, let me add that I said in my comment that you were responding to: "The standard theory for a while has been that they are interdimensional."

It's a theory (actually just a hypothesis). That's all. I have no idea whether it's accurate or not.

248 posted on 11/23/2025 2:41:54 AM PST by RoosterRedux (“Critical thinking is hard; that’s why most people just jump to conclusions.”—Jung (paraphrased))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

Good point.


249 posted on 11/23/2025 5:17:01 AM PST by dinodino ( Shut it down anyway. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

I’ll never forget the Navy intel guy who called into Alex Jones multiple times from FL back in 2016-2017. Last time he was heard from he got overheated explaining how a UFO threat soon to be revealed was going to be the cause for bringing all the nations of the earth together—and how it was going to be beautiful.


250 posted on 11/23/2025 5:23:52 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“You’re free to say “I’m not buying it.” The issue is when that gets turned into “anything I can’t personally see is nonsense.” That’s not skepticism — it’s a self-imposed blind spot.”

I accept this criticism, however, we have an unending flow of “whistleblowers” over the years making these sorts of claims. I think it’s appropriate to have a “show me” attitude before trusting these claims.

The math doesn’t work for interstellar travel, and the physics doesn’t really work for interdimensional travel either. So, show me, and I’ll believe it if there is actual evidence.


251 posted on 11/24/2025 7:48:16 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

“accuse me of supporting the interdimensional hypothesis”

I am not saying you believe or do not believe anything.

You have to test a hypothesis to find out if it is reasonable. So without evidence - it’s hard to believe this.


252 posted on 11/24/2025 7:50:31 PM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
Breaking 📰📰📰 News

Bat Boy's Stolen Mini Cooper FOUND!!


253 posted on 11/30/2025 8:04:42 AM PST by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the Days of Lot; They did Eat, They Drank, They Bought, They Sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-253 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson