Posted on 11/22/2025 5:10:59 AM PST by RoosterRedux
I don’t believe that any governments have, or have had, ‘bodies’ - or as Grusch sensitively suggests, ‘biologics’.
I’m not from Missouri; but Show Me.
Well I do allow for the possibility it’s all lies...some sort of put on or psy-op.
I’ll join you in “show me “ land!
What’s wrong with saying “I’m not buying it”?
Why not? because “seeing is believing”.
“interdimensional” beings is pure nonsense. There is no proof that there are actual, practical, dimensions that are beyond what we can see, touch, and experience every moment of your existence.
If there is something that can change my mind, I’d like to see it, until then, I’m going with “If we have anything at all, it’s got to be that we’ve got the dumbest, laziest aliens who skimp on UFO maintenance, don’t change the oil or check the brakes.
I don’t care how many grainy videos, or how many whistleblowers are interviewed. There is another explanation other than “it’s aliens” for anything that might turn out to be real. We just don’t know it yet.
This is a rational view - fully encapsulated in the efficient language of “I’m not buying it”
Clickbait.
You’re free to say “I’m not buying it.” The issue is when that gets turned into “anything I can’t personally see is nonsense.” That’s not skepticism — it’s a self-imposed blind spot.
Most of what we accept as real we’ve never seen ourselves: atoms, Wi-Fi, radio waves, subatomic particles, even most countries on a map. We trust evidence, not direct personal experience. So dismissing unseen possibilities on the grounds that you haven’t seen them isn’t a rational standard — it’s an impossible one.
The honest position is simply: “We don’t know what’s going on yet.”
By the way, are you an atheist? Even belief in God is based on trust in realities we don’t see or touch.
Bret Baier is “clickbait”? You can do better than that.;-)
Garry Nolan isn’t “a medical doctor.” He’s a world-class Stanford scientist, a leading immunologist, and one of the most cited researchers in his field.
Jacques Vallée isn’t “a guy who saw UFOs.” He’s a computer scientist, co-developer of early internet architecture, and an astronomer who worked on classified tracking systems.
Dismissing their views because they’re not the “right kind” of experts isn’t skepticism — it’s filtering out serious voices because their conclusions make you uncomfortable.
You don’t have to agree with them, but pretending they’re unqualified is simply inaccurate. And dismissing a person’s argument by diminishing their background isn’t skepticism — it’s an ad hominem. If you want to critique their conclusions, address the reasoning, not the resume.
It's a theory (actually just a hypothesis). That's all. I have no idea whether it's accurate or not.
Good point.
I’ll never forget the Navy intel guy who called into Alex Jones multiple times from FL back in 2016-2017. Last time he was heard from he got overheated explaining how a UFO threat soon to be revealed was going to be the cause for bringing all the nations of the earth together—and how it was going to be beautiful.
“You’re free to say “I’m not buying it.” The issue is when that gets turned into “anything I can’t personally see is nonsense.” That’s not skepticism — it’s a self-imposed blind spot.”
I accept this criticism, however, we have an unending flow of “whistleblowers” over the years making these sorts of claims. I think it’s appropriate to have a “show me” attitude before trusting these claims.
The math doesn’t work for interstellar travel, and the physics doesn’t really work for interdimensional travel either. So, show me, and I’ll believe it if there is actual evidence.
“accuse me of supporting the interdimensional hypothesis”
I am not saying you believe or do not believe anything.
You have to test a hypothesis to find out if it is reasonable. So without evidence - it’s hard to believe this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.