Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cronos
The 1975 drama, one of the only films to ever receive the big five Oscars, remains a [...].

Grave syntactical flaw in the first sentence! FAIL!

The phrase "one of the only films to ever receive the big five Oscars" is awkward and logically imprecise.

"One of the only" is a problematic construction because "only" already implies exclusivity. Grammatically, it creates a clash: "one of" suggests membership in a larger set, while "only" suggests a set of one.

A clearer phrasing would be "one of the few films to ever receive…" or simply "among the rare films to receive…."

Is this what we have come to expect from The Guardian?!

Regards,

10 posted on 11/20/2025 11:04:19 PM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek

Wbere have you been? 30 years ago this would have been a valid criticism of the Guardian. Today, the fact that all of the words in the opening sentence are spelled correctly and there is verb tense agreement is a thumbs up for the ‘Grauniad’.


18 posted on 11/21/2025 2:59:23 AM PST by Merrick (Yep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson