To: CharlesOConnell; SaveFerris; gundog; Kenny Bania
I think I can summarize this.
2 posted on
11/15/2025 11:27:09 AM PST by
Larry Lucido
(Donate! Don't just post clickbait.)
To: CharlesOConnell
with extra-legal state homicide against fishermen in the Carribean, being blasted to smithereens but, when a few survive, they are let go with no prosecutions for lack of cocaine or fentanyl evidence.STOP RIGHT THERE!
Before we go any further, do you think that?
Will you think that forever?
3 posted on
11/15/2025 11:38:42 AM PST by
NonValueAdded
(First, I was a clinger, then deplorable, now I'm garbage. Feel the love? )
To: CharlesOConnell
The issue today is
- God-given, constitutionally-protected individual FREEDOM from unconstitutional gov't coercion vs.
- the TYRANNY of unconstitutional federal gov't command and control.
4 posted on
11/15/2025 11:54:37 AM PST by
Jim W N
(MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
To: CharlesOConnell
Well theres pros and cons to it.
Probabilities and such on how people will react is food to know, for government and the individuals own decision making.
The difference is what you do with the info/how you use it. If you use it for bad ends, thats not good for society or individuals. If youmuse it for good reasons, its beneficial for society and individuals. If it makes you see a person only as a ststistic, maybe not so good. If it doesn’t, no issue.
5 posted on
11/15/2025 12:29:45 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: CharlesOConnell
6 posted on
11/15/2025 4:49:49 PM PST by
Albion Wilde
(To live free is the greatest gift; to die free is the greatest victory. —Erica Kirk)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
