Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MarlonRando

I believe that higher risk hits even earlier at 35.


8 posted on 11/15/2025 7:36:56 AM PST by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: HombreSecreto; MarlonRando
MarlonRando: Actually with men, don’t the chances for having a child with Down’s Syndrome go up after age 40?

HombreSecreto: I believe that higher risk hits even earlier at 35.

The correlation between increasing paternal age and the likelihood of having a child with Down syndrome (trisomy 21) appears to be real - but modest. Maternal age remains the dominant driver of risk. When analyses adjust for maternal age, paternal age generally shows a smaller, independent effect. Some studies even suggest a U‑shaped pattern, with slightly higher risk in very young fathers and in fathers over 40, compared to fathers in their 20s–30s.

Empirical data indicates that around 90–95% of Down syndrome cases originate from maternal nondisjunction, while only 5–10% are paternal in origin. This imbalance suggests that defective sperm rarely succeed in fertilization compared to defective eggs.

In short, the human ovum is a stationary target - if it is defective, it's still a possible target.

The human spermatozoa are the "arrows" flying towards that target - and the MULTIPLE barriers present in the female reproductive tract act as a "Great Barrier" to defective spermatozoa.

Regards,

13 posted on 11/15/2025 7:52:35 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson