Posted on 11/15/2025 7:25:53 AM PST by Taxman
A woman in her late thirties posts a simple complaint online: “Men can have kids into their seventies. I’ve only got a few years left. That’s so unfair.”
Within hours, her mentions are a war zone. Some men sneer about “geriatric eggs.” Others write manifestos about feminism and hypergamy. A few women defend her, but the thread collapses into the same argument we’ve been having for decades.
In Britain, a thirty-four-year-old woman recently sued her ex-boyfriend, claiming he had “stolen her childbearing years.” After ten years together, he ended the relationship without fulfilling his promises of marriage and children. Now, she’s demanding enough compensation to pay for in vitro fertilization, arguing that at her age, the damage is irreversible. The story, which may or may not be apocryphal, made international headlines (New York Post, Nov. 9, 2025).
None of this is about fairness. It’s about biology.
Both scenes expose the same raw truth: the difference between men and women starts in the body. Women face a narrow reproductive window and carry the heavier cost of sex and childbearing. Men can father children for decades and are built to compete for access. That single asymmetry — who can bear life, and when — shapes everything that follows.
Feminism can deny it, but it can’t erase it. The entire struggle between men and women — resentment, rivalry, dependency, love — traces back to unyielding biological facts.
Biology and the Social Machinery
Men and women were never designed for identical roles. Men are stronger and more expendable. Women are fertile for a brief span and pay a higher price for reproduction. Left unmanaged, that imbalance leads to chaos: predation, jealousy, neglect. Civilizations that survived learned to harness male aggression into protection and tie sexual access to responsibility.
That is where social machinery began.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
1. FReeper courtesy demands that you ping any FReeper whom you mention in your posting. You mentioned both A_perfect_lady and ansel12, but neglected to ping them.
2. Because there is no rule here saying that a comment to one FReeper can only be in response to what that FReeper said to the previous FReeper. It can, instead, be a comment on, e.g., the overall hypocrisy of a FReeper who criticizes others for "spending hours" arguing with other FReepers and for having a "repulsive" tone and attitude.
3. You came onto this thread, read the main article (apparently finding it unworthy of commentary), browsed through more than TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY (mostly) contentious posts - many of which brought up some highly interesting points, touching upon human evolution and sexuality, politics, abortion, and the Bible - and then chose only to criticize the fact that, in one of my posts, I finally vented my frustration at a_perfect_lady's intransigence and hypocrisy, by quoting a comment she made to me in another thread on the same friggin' topic?! (The rise of singlehood is reshaping the world: A great relationship recession is under way)
Having you nothing productive to say on the topic itself?!
Dude, that's like arming yourself with a high-precision, long-range rifle, traveling back in time to Berlin on Jan. 31, 1933 to visit the newly elected Reichskanzler Adolf Hitler - and politely tapping him on the shoulder to helpfully point out a typographical error on pg. 135 of Mein Kampf!
While you might not be A_perfect_lady sneakily posting under a dual identity, you and she certainly do suffer from the same fallacious reasoning!
Regards,
Jamie Wilson appears to be a very smart young woman. For that reason, she will probably be loathed by most of the women out there as well as the relative handful of apex alpha men who take advantage of this current social situation. The only ones who are seen benefiting from the old order are the men both groups look down upon — actually, everybody would benefit.
The truth hurts.
Yes, both sides are at fault with this anarchy.
That's not leading, that's running away, convinced they did nothing wrong.
Women are either going to lose their feminist ways or die alone with their cats.
It still amuses me that men think they are better companions than our pets are. And that years of dealing with a selfish overgrown brat who hates all women is worth it just so at the very end you can hear him complaining that he's hungry as you're drawing your last breath.
That's all I'm saying. But around here, saying men share some blame too is like saying "It's Okay to be White" in Compton.
A man on Newsmax yesterday reported on a study that showed that widows are much happier than then they were married. (I know that was true in my mother’s life.)
Then she sold the farm, moved to town, started wearing pants (!), bought a little golf cart to tool around in... she lived another 17 years, and was pretty happy. I remember once when I asked her if she would do it all over again, she said, "No, I wouldn't get married, I'd join the Army!" I was pretty startled at the time, but I'm older now, and I get it.
And I'm not saying "All Men Suck." But men who think all of society's ills are because women got birth control and the right to open a bank account... they are the kind of men a woman is happier without.
Your mom sounds a lot like mine. She was a preacher’s wife for 50+ years, but Dad wasn’t one of those kind, gentle preachers. He was a tyrant, and horribly verbally abusive to her (physically abusive to us kids).
Dad died in 2008. The day after the funeral we took her to Social Security to handle typical paperwork. Directly after to the car dealership where my sister (Baldwin77) and I bought her a car. She had been prohibited from driving, but my aunt had secretly been giving her lessons and she had a license.
She never resorted to wearing pants — the horror!, but she did start wearing ... EARRINGS! Like the heathen do, y’know - LOL!
She died 16 years later at 99 years old. She was so happy when she got her life.
Having you nothing productive to say on the topic itself?!
Generally when I come late to a thread and find that what I want to say has already been said by others, I don't clog up the thread with extraneous comments. What do you do, sir?
I see you're not going to answer why you replied to a 6 day old comment on a different thread. So be it. But I recommend you seek professional help. Your obsession with A_perfect_lady can't be good for you or your marriage.
It’s really quite tragic, in my opinion. There are a lot of these stories, which just do not matter to men in the slightest. Whether women are happy or not under male dominion is about as important as how the livestock feel. Of course, a loving husband is undoubtedly a wonderful thing. But if you can’t have that, freedom is definitely better than a bad husband.
“It takes a mighty good husband to be better than none.” A quote in a little book I was given when I got married.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.