Instead of slinging nasty invective, maybe Klinghoffer of tony Mercer Island could offer some irrefutable data to counter Watson’s considered conclusions.
That he sneers and labels the man using conclusionary reasons means he’s the one who’s prejudiced.
Watson and Crick's work is the bedrock of so many further discoveries, all springing from and compounded with what we learned from them about DNA structures and functions.
Here’s another white guy smeared for being just a little too smart:
https://www.takimag.com/article/the_talk_nonblack_version_john_derbyshire/2/
He uses empirical science, facts and sheeit. Skip to #11 if your head hurts.