Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sopo

I always am amused when folks around here calls someone a “stupid racist”.

Obviously a lot of very intelligent folks throughout history were racists.

Mr. Watson was one of them.


6 posted on 11/08/2025 5:40:22 AM PST by cgbg ("The truth is not for all men, but only for those who seek it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: cgbg

I agree!


10 posted on 11/08/2025 5:56:55 AM PST by quilterdebbie (We will endeavor to persevere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg

I knew him well. He always spoke his mind.


13 posted on 11/08/2025 6:07:34 AM PST by SixIron (Golf and liberal thinking- life's great frustrations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg
--- "Obviously a lot of very intelligent folks throughout history were racists."

A lot of them, and of ALL "races." Using the term is itself a support of the concept that "race" is a reality. Only the PERCEPTION of race is a reality, given that today the US changes its definitions from time to time. Most recently:

1) American Indian or Alaska Native
2) Asian
3) Black or African American
4) Hispanic or Latino
5) Middle Eastern or North African
6) Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
7) White

Updates to Race/Ethnicity Standards for Our Nation United States Census Bureau.

So long ago the now-abandonned taxonomy was:

1) Caucasoid
2) Negroid
3) Mongoloid
4) Capoid
5) Australoid

The BELIEF that racial groups are somehow distinct by "color terminology" and that values can be assigned to these is fallacious. An associated BELIEF that a taxonomic hierarchy somehow defines "race" is also demonstrably fallacious.

Thus, the ludicrous assertion which I have heard on the streets of NYC so long ago -- "Blacks cannot be racist" -- is a laugh, for the sentence itself relies on "race" and then says one "race" is not "racist."

Use to term to argue for group characteristics of a certain value(s) different from another group is "racist" for it builds on those shifting sands of language. Use "race" and one is "racist."

Some of the long abandoned terms and taxonomies for "race" are a hoot, should one want to stroll into the historical weeds.

15 posted on 11/08/2025 6:18:30 AM PST by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg

Pattern recognition is “racism” and “bigotry” to many people, unfortunately.


21 posted on 11/08/2025 6:39:17 AM PST by pburiak (You really think we can vote our way out of this? That's so cute...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg
Obviously a lot of very intelligent folks throughout history were racists.

Mr. Watson was one of them.

Would it be "racist" to observe that Africans have darker skin than Europeans, on average? Is it any more "racist" to observe that on average, Africans underperform Europeans on standard intelligence tests? Or that Africans, on average, outperform Europeans on the 100 meter dash?

45 posted on 11/08/2025 9:38:13 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Nullius in verba)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cgbg

Watson wasn’t racist.


55 posted on 11/08/2025 1:21:15 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson