Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vaccines, autism, and An Inconvenient Study
American Thinker ^ | 2 Nov, 2025 | Richard Kirk

Posted on 11/02/2025 5:08:22 AM PST by MtnClimber

click here to read article


Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: DugwayDuke

Further facts:

* every med authority insisted that the mRNA vax was essential to prevent spread — a blatant lie they all knew. Pharm revealed after pressed in EU that NO tests were run to look at transmission. And, the vax does not.
* The lie about vax was hidden when the CDC re-defined “vaccine” to omit protection against transmission. This latter aspect, protecting against transmission, is the only reason that society would benefit from a vaccine.
* all medical publications were totally corrupted <2019. They quit peer review of any value. Just published crappola so long as they kept getting subsidies.


21 posted on 11/02/2025 8:30:16 AM PST by bobbo666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

A legitimate question that concerns the immune system is what does medical science know and not know concerning the immune system repeated responses to “artificial infections” - meaning vaccines administered to create a specific immune system response, when what the immune system recognizes, systematically throughout the body, is not the same as if the body were truly infected by an actual viral or bacterial agent. And along with that, knowing that inflammation is often part of the effect of the immune system’s response to viral and bacterial infections, is such inflammation, internally, not experienced with all the repeated vaccinations?

When there is inflammation internally, with no viral or bacterial agent present, cell damage can be occurring, just due to that inflammation.

When the immune system is “over responding” to situation (a cytokine storm) that can be a more critical problem than whatever agent started that storm. That happened allot with severe critical Covid patients - a cytokine storm caused so much inflammation that the cell damage from it was the key issue doctors had to fight. Patients near death from damage caused by massive internal inflammation produced by the immune system.

I know that from my own experience with the autoimmune issue of psoriasis, and how the Pfizer Covid vaccine kicked off the worst psoriasis episode I had ever had my entire life.


22 posted on 11/02/2025 11:42:37 AM PST by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

RideForever wrote: “Interesting that you use statistics from 1974 going forward, when it’s been recent revelations that have left our kids with nearly 50% of all kids showing signs of autism; particularly CoVID.”

The claim that nearly 50% of all kids show signs of autism is incorrect; current data shows the prevalence is significantly lower, with recent estimates from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicating 1 in 36 children have been diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). While autism rates are increasing, the 50% figure is inaccurate and may stem from a misunderstanding of autism traits versus a formal diagnosis.

Accurate statistics: The most recent data from the CDC shows that 1 in 36 children in the U.S. have been diagnosed with ASD. This is a substantial increase from previous years, but still far from 50%.

RideForever wrote: “Speaking of kids, none of the embryos of CoVID genetic treatment in the Pfizer study survived. Now they want all inoculations to use and spread the tech, despite the death toll. These are no longer vaccinations, they are genetic treatments.”

The claim that “none of the embryos” in the Pfizer COVID vaccine study survived is false and a widely debunked myth.

Multiple studies, including preclinical animal studies conducted by Pfizer, as well as human studies involving women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), have found no evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine negatively affects fertility, embryo development, or
pregnancy outcomes.

Summary of the facts:

-Preclinical Studies: Before human trials were conducted in women of childbearing potential, Pfizer completed a developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) study in animals, which showed no evidence of fertility or reproductive toxicity.

- Human Studies (IVF): Several studies involving patients undergoing IVF treatments have compared outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated women, finding no significant differences in egg retrieval rates, fertilization rates, embryo quality, implantation rates, pregnancy rates, or early pregnancy loss rates.

-Misinformation Source: The false claim originated from a misinterpretation of a Pfizer document containing passively collected adverse event reports during the early vaccine rollout. An analysis of a small subset of the data from this registry used a flawed calculation to misleadingly suggest a high rate of fetal loss. This calculation was widely debunked by experts and fact-checking organizations.

-No Fetal Tissue in Vaccine: The Pfizer vaccine does not contain any fetal cells or tissue. Fetal cell lines (cells grown in a laboratory from tissue collected decades ago) were used for testing purposes during research and development to confirm the vaccine produced the desired antibodies, a common practice in medical research.
Scientific evidence and data from numerous studies confirm the safety of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines for those trying to conceive or who are pregnant

RideForever wrote: “”These are no longer vaccinations, they are genetic treatments.”

Vaccinations are not considered genetic treatments or gene therapy. While some modern vaccines, like the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, use genetic material (mRNA or DNA), they do not alter or interact with a person’s fundamental genetic makeup (DNA).


23 posted on 11/02/2025 12:46:47 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bobbo666

bobbo666 wrote: “Further facts: * every med authority insisted that the mRNA vax was essential to prevent spread — a blatant lie they all knew. Pharm revealed after pressed in EU that NO tests were run to look at transmission. And, the vax does not.”

When the vaccine prevents an infection, it also prevents the recipient from spreading the infection. Then there is no spread.


24 posted on 11/02/2025 12:49:06 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
While some modern vaccines, like the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, use genetic material (mRNA or DNA), they do not alter or interact with a person’s fundamental genetic makeup (DNA).

Where to start? The mXXX 'vaccines' cause a person to create a protein spike, and inserts that instruction in a cell's nucleus, thereby incorporating its reproduction when the DNA strand it has been added to is reproduced. There's no 'off' switch. You weren't born with the instructions to make the protein, you acquired them by a shot. It's certainly not the DNA you were born with.

25 posted on 11/02/2025 7:39:47 PM PST by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

RideForever wrote: “Where to start? The mXXX ‘vaccines’ cause a person to create a protein spike, and inserts that instruction in a cell’s nucleus, thereby incorporating its reproduction when the DNA strand it has been added to is reproduced. There’s no ‘off’ switch. You weren’t born with the instructions to make the protein, you acquired them by a shot. It’s certainly not the DNA you were born with.”

You might start with some real facts:

First of all, the mRNA vaccines do not enter the cell’s nucleus.

While some modern vaccines, like the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, use genetic material (mRNA or DNA), they do not alter or interact with a person’s fundamental genetic makeup (DNA).

This is essentially the old argument that the small pox vaccine would change you into a cow. The COVID-19 vaccines do not change or interact with your DNA in any way.

Here’s why:

Location: Your DNA is stored inside the nucleus of your cells. The material from the vaccines, whether mRNA or viral vector, never enters the nucleus; it stays in the cytoplasm (the outer part of the cell).

Mechanism:
mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna): These vaccines deliver messenger RNA (mRNA) instructions to your cells’ cytoplasm to produce a harmless piece of the virus’s spike protein. Once the protein is made, the body breaks down and gets rid of the temporary mRNA instructions within a few days.

So, yes, there is an ‘off switch’.

Viral vector vaccines (Johnson & Johnson): These use a harmless, weakened cold virus (an adenovirus) to deliver genetic material that also provides instructions to make the spike protein. The genetic material in this type of vaccine does not become part of your DNA either and the necessary enzyme for integration is not present in the cell.

Natural processes: The process of the vaccine using mRNA to make a protein is a natural biological process that happens in our cells every day. The vaccine simply uses this existing cellular machinery to teach your immune system to recognize and fight the virus.

Scientific and medical experts from organizations like the CDC, Mayo Clinic, and the National Institutes of Health confirm that it is biologically impossible for these vaccines to alter human genetic material.


26 posted on 11/03/2025 4:51:06 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

goodnesswins wrote: “Do you have children/grandchildren? 72 vaxes by age 18 and you don’t think that COULD BE A PROBLEM???”

Do you have children/grandchildren? Do you not want them protected from diseases? Which ones of these diseases do you want to unnecessarily inflict upon your children/grandchildren?

Children typically do not receive 72 vaccines. The recommended childhood immunization schedule in the United States includes a total of approximately 30 vaccines by the age of 18. These vaccines are administered in multiple doses over time, with some vaccines requiring as many as 5 doses. The specific number of vaccines and doses may vary slightly depending on the child’s individual health needs and the recommendations of their healthcare provider.

By age six, childhood vaccines in the U.S. protect against 14 serious diseases:

Diphtheria: A serious throat infection that can cause breathing problems and heart failure.

Tetanus (lockjaw): A bacterial infection that causes painful muscle tightening and spasms, often entering the body through wounds.

Pertussis (whooping cough): A highly contagious respiratory infection that causes violent coughing fits and is especially dangerous for babies.

Polio (poliomyelitis): A disabling and life-threatening disease that can infect the spinal cord and cause paralysis.

Measles: A very contagious viral infection that can cause rash, high fever, cough, and in rare cases, brain damage or death.

Mumps: A viral infection that causes fever and swollen glands and can lead to complications like deafness or
swelling of the brain.

Rubella (German measles): A viral infection that is usually mild in children but poses a serious risk to pregnant women as it can cause severe birth defects.

Hepatitis B: A viral infection that can cause lifelong chronic liver infection, liver damage, and liver cancer.
Hepatitis A: A viral infection of the liver spread through contaminated food or water or close contact with an infected person.

Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib): A bacterial infection that can lead to meningitis (swelling of the lining of the brain and spinal cord), pneumonia, and other severe infections.

Pneumococcal disease: A bacterial infection that can cause pneumonia, blood poisoning (sepsis), and meningitis.

Rotavirus: A highly contagious virus that is the leading cause of severe diarrhea, vomiting, and dehydration in young children.

Chickenpox (varicella): A very contagious disease that causes an itchy rash and fever and can lead to serious complications like pneumonia or brain swelling.

Influenza (flu): A viral infection of the respiratory
system; an annual flu shot is recommended starting at 6 months of age to prevent severe illness and complications.


27 posted on 11/03/2025 7:41:15 AM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

You did not answer my question...I am not anti vax but you know there are WAY too many vaxes given to children...or you are a paid shill.


28 posted on 11/03/2025 11:45:00 AM PST by goodnesswins (Make educ institutions return to the Mission...reading, writing, math...not Opinions & propaganda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins

goodnesswins wrote: “You did not answer my question...I am not anti vax but you know there are WAY too many vaxes given to children...or you are a paid shill.”

No, I don’t know that there are too many vaxes given to children. I do know that those vaccines prevent illnesses as was described in my response. I believe we are truly fortunate in having those vaccines so our children do not have to suffer.


29 posted on 11/03/2025 12:29:15 PM PST by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson