In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering, Pelham wrote: Not only do I pay attention, I actually go read the sources you post just for the fun of it.
Finding that the “Bombshell” you posted was retracted for “conclusions (that) were not supported by strong scientific data” is par for the course.
Better luck next time!
Learn to read. Discover that the truth was censored throughout the Plandemic, and articles were retracted which were valid because they wanted to hide the truth. Then, stop trolling me.
“Learn to read. Discover that the truth was censored throughout the Plandemic, and articles were retracted which were valid because they wanted to hide the truth. Then, stop trolling me.”
Don’t you still have access to the Q Safe Space where non-believers can be prevented from exposing conspiracy nut nonsense, aka “trolling”?
If that article that you posted was valid, the retraction itself could be rescinded. They have had years to do it.
It hasn’t been. Go figure. Probably when the journal said it was retracted for “methodological issues and conclusions not supported by strong scientific data” they meant it.
You want to pretend it’s because “truth was censored”. No, they told you why it was retracted, you just don’t accept that your source was exposed as being a sloppy and invalid study.
Someone who never speaks of “plandemic” nonsense and who still supports the vaccines created to combat the SARS-2 virus is Donald Trump, who you pretend to support. Why do you think that you are smarter and better informed than he is? Is this some delusion of superiorty at work? Inquiring trollers wanna know!