In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Bombshell Vax vs. Unvax Study Finally Sees the Light of Day — And the Results Are Staggering, Pelham wrote: It always pays to go look at the studies our resident Anti Jab fanatics like to post.
In this case when you check the link provided in post #5 you find:
“Retracted Article”
“See the retraction notice”Oops.
When you follow the link to the retraction notice and click on the full text button you find:
“This retracts the article “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination” in volume 17, 8674.”
“The journal retracts the article “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and Cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses along the Axis of Vaccination” cited above [1]. Following publication, concerns were brought to the attention of the editorial office regarding the validity of the conclusions of the published research.
“Adhering to our complaints procedure, an investigation was conducted that raised several methodological issues and confirmed that the conclusions were not supported by strong scientific data. The article is therefore retracted.
“This retraction is approved by the Editor in Chief of the journal.”
You haven't been paying attention. Valid research, like the fact that Ivermectin and HCQ work well, was 'retracted' and denied through professional threats. The Deep State still has a hold on parts of the Administration.
That retraction notice was 'naturally' applied in 2021, long before President Trump took office in 2025. The Plandemic and 'vaccine' hoax was still in motion.
Retraction in
Not only do I pay attention, I actually go read the sources you post just for the fun of it.
Finding that the “Bombshell” you posted was retracted for “conclusions (that) were not supported by strong scientific data” is par for the course.
Better luck next time!